Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, actionable four-step workflow with concrete curl examples, a request-matching table, and a well-signaled single reference file that carries the bulk API detail. Weaknesses are minor: some repeated instructions (read-only/no-trades, prefer-compare-endpoints) could be consolidated, and there is no error-recovery guidance for failed API responses.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated guidance: state 'read-only, never trade' and 'prefer compare endpoints' once in the Key rules list instead of three times and in three places respectively.
Add a brief error-recovery checkpoint in Step 3 for failed responses, e.g., a 401 means re-check that ADANOS_API_KEY is set, and an empty source payload should be reported as 'no data'.
Trim the duplicated 'Use it when' bullet list (which restates the frontmatter description) or the Step 4 presentation patterns that are repeated verbatim in references/api_reference.md, keeping only what differs.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes competence, but has minor trimmable redundancy: read-only/no-trading is stated three times ("This skill is read-only", "Never execute trades or convert the result into trading instructions", "not trade instructions") and "Prefer compare endpoints" appears in Step 2, Step 3, and Key rule 1. Not anchor 5 because those repeats mean not every token earns its place; above anchor 3 because the padding is minor with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable copy-paste curl commands with the X-API-Key header and concrete query params, a request-to-endpoint mapping table naming the exact fields, a working env-var probe, and a concrete output template. Examples cover the common cases (single-source, multi-source snapshot, multi-ticker), matching the anchor-5 example pattern. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (ensure API key → identify need → execute → present) with an explicit validation checkpoint: the ADANOS_API_KEY probe branches to remediation ("If ADANOS_API_KEY_MISSING, ask the user to set..."). Not anchor 5 because there is no recovery guidance for failed API responses (e.g., 401 or HTTP errors after execution); above anchor 3 because the key check is an explicit checkpoint with a feedback path, and the read-only nature means no destructive/batch validation cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections keep the body at quick-start level while a single one-level-deep reference (references/api_reference.md, verified to exist) is clearly signaled with its contents ("endpoint guide, field meanings, and example workflows") and an explicit read trigger ("when you need the exact field names, query parameters, or recommended answer patterns"). Not anchor 4 because the split is appropriate and navigation is easy, with no buried or nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |