Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a lean, actionable instruction sheet: a clear sequenced workflow, a copy-paste manifest template with useful inline comments, and an explicit error-handling step. Its only gaps are the absence of a worked example and a manifest validation checkpoint before install.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows: a 5-step workflow, a commented YAML manifest template, and one closing preference note — every token earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The manifest template is copy-paste ready with informative inline comments ("# must match the directory name", "# e.g. linkedin, gmail, twitter") and the workflow names a concrete tool invocation ("Call the `capability_install` tool with `capability_id: <capability-id>`"), but there is no fully worked example manifest showing a completed case, keeping it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five steps are clearly sequenced (clarify outcome, ensure skills exist, write manifest, call capability_install, report result) and step 5 handles the `needs_connection` error path, but there is no validation checkpoint on the manifest itself before install (e.g. confirming id matches the directory), so it fits anchor 4 rather than the explicit-validation anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references (none of references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist and the body cites none), and its two sections (Workflow, Manifest format) are well-organized — per the rubric's simple-skill guideline this earns a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |