Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured planning skill that assumes Claude's competence and gives actionable, specific guidance with a clear sequenced workflow. Its only weak spot is actionability lacking a concrete worked example.
Suggestions
Add one short worked example (e.g. a sample week's row or a tiny table) so the output format is unambiguous and copy-paste-ready.
Optionally add a brief sanity-check step in the workflow (e.g. 'confirm each slot maps to the stated goal and mix ratio') to give the sequence an explicit checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized (~30 lines) with no padding and no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific — a starting mix ratio (3:1 value-to-promotional), per-platform cadence, and an explicit output column set (date, platform, type/theme, hook, format, time) — but it is procedural direction without a worked example, leaving minor gaps versus fully copy-paste-ready guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'How to build the plan' section gives a clear 5-step sequence with a deliberate-slack step; validation is only implicit, but since planning a calendar is non-destructive and not an automated batch operation, the destructive/batch cap does not apply and the minor validation gaps place this just above the midpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, requires no external references, and is organized into clear sections (When to use, Planning principles, How to build the plan, Output format), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |