Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-structured instructional skill with concrete prompting guidance and a built-in review checkpoint; its only notable gap is the absence of a fully worked example prompt.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it names camera moves rather than defining them and uses sharp directives like '"cinematic" is not a camera move'; every section earns its place with no padding or restating of known concepts. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific (named camera moves, duration-by-length rules, an anatomy checklist, numbered working steps), but it stops short of a fully worked example prompt, which is the gap versus the copy-paste-ready anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step 'How to work' sequence is clear and includes a judge-against-the-brief checkpoint, but the recovery loop is implicit rather than an explicit 'if X fails, do Y', so it sits at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines, needs no external references (none present in references/scripts/assets), and is organized into clear well-signaled sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |