Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable and token-efficient with copy-paste JSON examples and clean structure. The main gap is the absence of validation/verification guidance around destructive actions (delete, unpin), which limits workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a brief verification step for destructive actions, e.g. confirm the messageId/channelId before deleteMessage or unpinMessage, or read back state after the call.
For editMessage/deleteMessage, note how to obtain/confirm the messageId (e.g. from readMessages) so Claude can validate the target before acting.
Consider a short 'Verify results' note after batch-like actions (readMessages limit, listPins, reactions) to close the feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: short overview, a compact input list, and tight per-action JSON examples with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready JSON payloads for every action, with concrete field names, example IDs, and an action-group table making the common cases immediately runnable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Actions are listed clearly but several are destructive (deleteMessage, unpinMessage) or batch-oriented with no validation/verification steps, which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the destructive-operations rule. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-organized single-file skill under 150 lines with no need for external references; sections and a summary table provide easy navigation, matching the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |