Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and fully actionable with executable examples and clean structure. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: the directory-change instruction is imprecise and the remote async video-generation/download flow lacks any validation of the output.
Suggestions
Replace the vague 'cd to the corresponding directory' with an explicit working-directory requirement or remove it if the script handles paths.
Add a verification step after download, e.g. check the file exists and is non-empty, or confirm the TOS URL was returned successfully before declaring success.
Note expected polling/waiting behavior and failure handling (the script polls and prints failure) so Claude knows to surface errors to the user.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, well-sectioned content with no padding or over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides the exact executable command and three copy-paste examples covering the pure-text, URL-first-frame, and local-first-frame cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step sequence is clear, but step 3's 'cd to the corresponding directory' is vague and there is no validation that the download succeeded or the output file is valid, fitting the steps-with-checkpoints-missing anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple under-50-line skill with well-organized sections and a single referenced script (scripts/video_generate.py) verified to exist, qualifying for the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |