Content
46%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content lays out a well-sequenced multi-step workflow with concrete schemas, but it is padded, lacks executable code, and references module files that are not bundled. Batch/database operations run without explicit validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Provide the referenced module files (domain_classifier.md, element_extractor.md, tagger.md, library_updater.md) or inline their actual logic instead of pointing at missing paths.
Add an explicit validation/feedback checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., verify DB write succeeded, retry on extraction failure) before reporting — required for batch and database operations.
Trim the full ~50-line sample report to a compact illustrative excerpt and remove redundant '⭐ 新增/关键增强' annotations to tighten token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly procedural spec rather than concept explanation, but it carries noticeable padding — repeated '⭐ 新增/关键增强' markers, overlapping Step 0/0.1 type-detection steps, and a ~50-line full sample report — fitting anchor 3's 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the lean anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance exists (named modules, JSON output shapes, element_id patterns, a reuse-scoring table) but no executable code is provided and the referenced module files do not exist in the bundle, matching anchor 3's 'some concrete guidance but incomplete / pseudocode-ish'. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (Step 0→6 with branching), but the skill performs batch learning and database writes without an explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint; per the batch/destructive cap this cannot exceed anchor 3 despite the clean sequence. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist yet the body references modules/domain_classifier.md, element_extractor.md, tagger.md, library_updater.md and extracted_results/ paths, and large blocks (full output report, acceptance spec) are inlined, fitting anchor 2's 'content that belongs in separate files is inlined / references buried'. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |