Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The core workflow is excellent — a fully executable draft→validate→compress→re-validate loop with real deterministic scripts, bounded retries, and explicit escalation. Quality is dragged down by off-task boilerplate (bug-collection and common-constraint compliance blocks) and structural defects: a dangling `config.yaml` dependency, duplicated headings, and section headings swallowed by the output-template code fence.
Suggestions
Move the `bensz-collect-bugs` procedures and the "公共硬约束" compliance block into a shared reference file (or the skill's own reference), keeping SKILL.md focused on the abstract-generation workflow.
Resolve the dangling `config.yaml` references — either ship a `config.yaml` in the skill bundle or inline the default values (content_points_min/max, title_candidates_default, zh_recommended_sentences, output headings) directly in SKILL.md.
Fix the structure: merge the duplicate `### 输入` sections, and move `### 输出管理`/`### 校验` out of the fenced output template so they render as real headings.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core guidance (five-sentence structure with percentage budget table, compression priorities P0/P1/P2, closed-loop validation) is dense and earns its tokens, but there are several padded sections unrelated to the task: the `bensz-collect-bugs`/`gh` bug-reporting steps ("优先使用 `bensz-collect-bugs` 按规范记录到 `~/.bensz-skills/bugs/`…") and the entire "公共硬约束" block about BAC audits, credentials, SSRF, and path traversal. Matches 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation'; not 2 because the majority of the body is tight, task-specific instruction. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance with copy-paste commands tied to real shipped scripts: "python3 skills/nsfc-abstract/scripts/validate_abstract.py - --json --diff --strict", "写入：python3 skills/nsfc-abstract/scripts/write_abstracts_md.py <input> --strict", stdin usage, an exact output template for `NSFC-ABSTRACTS.md`, and concrete post-write reporting steps. Both referenced scripts exist in `scripts/`. Matches the 'fully executable, copy-paste ready' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The hard-constraint path is a textbook feedback loop: "先检测，再压缩，再检测，合格后再写入" with a bounded retry ("最多 3 轮") and explicit escalation options when limits can't be met (delete info / relax `config.yaml` / user-supplied shorter summary), plus a 失败与恢复 section. Matches 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery'. Not 4 because validation checkpoints are deterministic-scripted and every failure branch has a defined next action. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are one level deep and clearly signaled ("见 `skills/nsfc-abstract/references/info_form.md`", "遵循 `…/references/title-rules.md`"), and both files plus a scripts README exist — but organization has real gaps: the body repeatedly defers to a `config.yaml` ("以 `config.yaml:limits.content_points_min/max` 为准", `config.yaml:output.zh_heading`, etc.) that is not present in the bundle, `### 输入` appears twice (top level and under 流程), and the `### 输出管理`/`### 校验` headings are buried inside the output-template code fence where they render as template text. Matches 'some structure but could be better organized'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |