Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with concrete scripts and a clear main flow, but it lacks explicit validation/feedback-loop checkpoints in the workflow and does not explicitly signal the bundled checklist reference from the body.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/feedback step to the 主流程 (e.g. after 汇总聚合, validate findings against 预检证据包 and re-run a thread if gaps are found) to lift workflow_clarity above 3.
Link references/qc_checklist.md explicitly from the body (e.g. in the 多线程独立 QC step: '每 thread 检查清单见 references/qc_checklist.md') so progressive disclosure is clearly signaled.
Trim the repeated archiving-path detail between the description and the §1 定位 run 目录 section to tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean — hard rules, inputs/outputs, a sequenced main flow, and executable script examples — assuming Claude's competence; only minor repetition of the archiving path detail keeps it from a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-pasteable script invocations with full arguments and explicit input/output file paths; minor gaps where some steps only describe rather than fully instruct. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence is present, but validation checkpoints are implicit (validation.json output, 复现信息 appendix) rather than expressed as explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops in the flow. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is an overview with detailed checklist material moved one level deep to references/qc_checklist.md and scripts organized separately; the body does not explicitly link the checklist reference, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |