CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

nsfc-research-content-writer

当用户明确要求"写/改研究内容""研究内容+创新+年度计划编排"时使用。为 NSFC 正文"(二)研究内容"写作/重构,并同步编排"特色与创新"和"三年年度研究计划",输出可直接落到 LaTeX 模板的三个 extraTex 文件。

73

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit validation/checklist steps, and exemplary progressive disclosure via real one-level-deep references. The main weakness is conciseness: the writing-philosophy section duplicates guidance already present in the workflow.

Suggestions

Collapse or prune the '写作哲学:像人类专家一样写' section: its two-stage mode, narrative-validation, innovation-persuasion, and annual-plan-progression points already appear in workflow steps 3–5 — keep only what adds new information.

Move the '专家写作的核心特征' bullet list into a reference file (e.g. anti_patterns.md or a new writing_style.md) and link it, leaving the body as a lean overview.

The '一个判断标准' peer-review heuristic is valuable but discursive; consider condensing it to one line or folding it into the DoD checklist reference.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient domain-specific guidance (no generic concept explanations), but the '写作哲学:像人类专家一样写' section restates the two-stage mode, narrative-driven validation, innovation persuasion, and annual-plan progression already covered in the workflow steps, so it could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete and specific for an instruction skill: three named output files, an explicit forbidden-edit list, page/word budgets (12–15 pages, 12000–15000 字), framework options, a numbering-purge rule, and copy-paste-ready skeleton/example references.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly numbered 7-step '工作流(按顺序执行)' with an explicit consistency-validation step (6), output purification, a referenced DoD checklist, and feedback prompts (ask when info incomplete; prompt when target files missing).

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Overview body points to 10 well-labeled, one-level-deep reference files (写作小抄 section) plus contextually-linked info_form and dod_checklist; all referenced paths resolve to real files in ./references/, with content appropriately split and easy to navigate.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-scoped description that states concrete actions, explicit natural-language triggers, and a clear deliverable (three extraTex files), answering both 'what' and 'when' in third-person voice. No voice or verbosity penalties apply.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — '研究内容写作/重构', '同步编排特色与创新和三年年度研究计划', '输出…三个 extraTex 文件' — with a specific deliverable of three named tex files, matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (writes/refactors the NSFC (二) section and orchestrates 2.2/2.3 into three extraTex files) and 'when' ('当用户明确要求…时使用'), with an explicit trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Quotes natural user phrasing — '写/改研究内容', '研究内容+创新+年度计划编排' — that a user would actually say, giving good coverage of natural trigger terms.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to a clear niche — NSFC grant section (二) writing with LaTeX extraTex output — with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.