Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow and a strong reference bundle. It loses points mainly on conciseness due to redundant motivational prose and generic boilerplate.
Suggestions
Collapse the '专家写作的核心特征' and '一个判断标准' sections into the relevant steps or move to a reference; they restate points already made in steps 3–5.
Trim the generic '公共硬约束' boilerplate to only the constraints specific to this skill, or link it as a shared reference instead of inlining.
Add an explicit verify-before-write gate in apply mode (e.g., run the dod_checklist / validate_skill.py before writing the three .tex files) to strengthen the workflow's validation feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient domain-specific guidance, but the '专家写作的核心特征' and '一个判断标准' sections restate concepts already covered in the steps, and the '公共硬约束' boilerplate adds generic padding. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance for an instruction-only skill: specific file paths (extraTex/2.*.tex), page/word budgets (12–15 pages, 12000–15000 字), framework options, and explicit output-purification rules. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 7-step sequence with a consistency-check checkpoint (step 6) and a two-phase planning/writing model; validation is present though somewhat implicit rather than a hard verify-before-write gate. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with 10 well-signaled one-level-deep markdown references (all real files), but some philosophical prose is inlined in the body that could live in a reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |