Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with excellent progressive disclosure via real reference files. The main improvement area is tightening the redundant philosophical prose and making the validation feedback loop explicit.
Suggestions
Consolidate the '写作哲学' two-phase model with the workflow steps to remove restated guidance and tighten conciseness.
Make the consistency-check feedback loop explicit (e.g., 'if 校验 fails, revise 2.1/2.2/2.3 and re-run 校验 until passing') to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Trim motivational phrasing in '写作哲学' to concrete heuristics, since Claude already understands expert writing norms.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly dense and actionable, but the '写作哲学' section and the two-phase restatement partly restate workflow guidance already covered, yielding minor over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete file paths, explicit structure (问题→目标→内容→路线→验证), page/word budgets, and hard constraints (禁止改动 main.tex); as an instruction-only skill the absence of code is not penalized, with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with a step-6 一致性校验 checkpoint and a referenced DoD checklist, though the validate→fix→retry feedback loop is only implicit rather than explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references (info_form, dod_checklist, subgoal_triplet_examples, etc.), all of which exist as real files in references/. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |