CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

nsfc-research-foundation-writer

当用户明确要求"写/改研究基础""研究基础+工作条件+风险应对编排"时使用。为 NSFC 正文"(三)研究基础"写作/重构,并同步编排"工作条件"和"研究风险应对",用证据链证明项目可行、资源条件对位研究内容、风险预案可执行。

72

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill body is well-structured, actionable, and follows good progressive disclosure with verified reference files. Only minor conciseness gains are possible by trimming FAQ redundancy.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean and purposeful with no padding about concepts Claude already knows, though the FAQ section restates a few workflow constraints already covered above.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete file paths, exact script commands (validate_skill.py, run_checks.py), structured output formats, and placeholder conventions that are directly executable.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clearly numbered workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (校验1/校验2), failure-handling feedback loops ('校验失败时标记[需补充]'), and a Definition-of-Done section.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md acts as an overview with inline, one-level-deep links to real references (info_form.md, dod_checklist.md) and scripts; navigation is clear and files exist.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is precise and well-targeted, clearly stating both the capability and the explicit trigger conditions within a distinct NSFC niche. Minor specificity could be added to push trigger-term and action coverage to fully comprehensive.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('写作/重构研究基础', '同步编排工作条件和研究风险应对', '用证据链证明项目可行') with a defined scope, just shy of fully comprehensive coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (写作/重构研究基础并编排工作条件与风险应对) and 'when' (当用户明确要求...时使用) with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases like '写/改研究基础' and '研究基础+工作条件+风险应对编排' map well to what a user would say, though a few synonymous phrasings are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Narrow NSFC-specific niche with distinct, domain-locked triggers; minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.