CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

nsfc-research-foundation-writer

当用户明确要求"写/改研究基础""研究基础+工作条件+风险应对编排"时使用。为 NSFC 正文"(三)研究基础"写作/重构,并同步编排"工作条件"和"研究风险应对",用证据链证明项目可行、资源条件对位研究内容、风险预案可执行。

64

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/nsfc-research-foundation-writer/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable body with a clear sequenced workflow and validation checkpoints, supported by real reference and script files. It is dragged down by repetition and a sizable shared-constraint boilerplate block that hurts token efficiency.

Suggestions

De-duplicate the file-editing prohibition: state the 'only edit extraTex/3.1 and 3.2, never main.tex/@config.tex/.cls/.sty' rule once in 约束 and reference it rather than repeating it in 目标输出 and 执行步骤1.

Condense or link out the '公共硬约束' boilerplate block (e.g., to a shared constraints reference) so the SKILL.md body stays focused on this skill's specific execution rules.

Link references/example_output.md from the body (alongside info_form.md and dod_checklist.md) so all bundle files are discoverable from the overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient and free of concept over-explanation, but the file-editing prohibition is repeated across 目标输出/执行步骤/约束 and the large '公共硬约束' boilerplate block inflates the body without adding skill-specific value.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete file paths, copy-able templates (平台/数据/样本/算力 formatting), and exact commands (mkdir -p, validate_skill.py), with only minor gaps since actual LaTeX scaffolding is delegated to the referenced example file.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered sequence (steps 1-5) includes explicit 一致性校验 checkpoints with methods/examples and a failure-handling + 失败与恢复 section, but the validation is consistency-checking against possibly-absent 2.1/2.3 rather than a validate-fix-retry loop on the output itself.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled links to references/info_form.md and references/dod_checklist.md plus separate scripts; the unreferenced references/example_output.md in the bundle is a minor navigation gap.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description with an explicit trigger clause and a clear, domain-specific statement of what the skill produces. Its only weakness is slightly less exhaustive action/synonym coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the NSFC domain and several concrete actions ('写作/重构'研究基础, '同步编排工作条件和研究风险应对', '用证据链证明项目可行'), but a couple of actions like '编排' remain somewhat high-level rather than fully enumerated.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (写作/重构研究基础并编排工作条件与风险应对) and 'when' ('当用户明确要求...时使用') with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger phrases ('写/改研究基础', '研究基础+工作条件+风险应对编排') that users would actually say, though a few synonyms/variations are not covered.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a very specific niche (NSFC grant proposal section 三-研究基础) with distinct, narrow triggers, making conflict with other skills minimal.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.