Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable commands and a well-sequenced, gated multi-step workflow, and it is mostly token-efficient. Its main defect is progressive disclosure: four referenced template files under a non-existent templates/ directory are dead links, undermining the otherwise clean reference structure.
Suggestions
Create the missing templates/ directory with manuscript_profile.template.json, scope_review.template.json, set3_similarity_review.template.json, and final_recommendations.template.json, or repoint those references to the files that actually exist.
Tighten recurring cautionary refrains (e.g. 'Set1 不是最终答案' and '不要退化成机械 token 打分') so each warning appears once, and factor the long workspace path into a variable to avoid repeating it verbatim in every command block.
Add an explicit validate-and-retry feedback loop for the script steps (e.g. what to do if shortlist_journals.py or fetch_pubmed_recent.py fails or returns an empty candidate set) to lift workflow clarity from a batch operation to a 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient imperative/procedural Chinese prose that assumes competence, but cautionary refrains recur ('不要把这一步误解为...', '不要再把这一步退化成机械 token 打分', 'Set1 不是最终答案' stated multiple times) and the long path placeholder is repeated verbatim in every command, adding trimmable padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every workflow step ships an executable command with full arguments (e.g. `python3 <skill_root>/scripts/shortlist_journals.py --workspace ... --profile ...`), names concrete output files, and lists required JSON fields — copy-paste ready with the one placeholder explained in '命令路径说明'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced six-step pipeline (profile → Set1 → verify/Set2 → PubMed → Set3 → final/report) with gating checkpoints (only Set2 journals passing 核验, only Set3 with include_in_set3=true reach the final report) and a 决策规则 checklist; missing an explicit script-failure 'fix and re-run' feedback loop keeps it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good and references are clearly signaled one level deep (references/*.md, scripts/*.py, assets/journal_catalog/2023IF.xlsx all exist), but four referenced template paths (`templates/manuscript_profile.template.json`, `scope_review.template.json`, `set3_similarity_review.template.json`, `final_recommendations.template.json`) point to a templates/ directory that does not exist in the bundle, breaking navigation for those entry points. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |