Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable workflow with explicit validation and appropriate progressive disclosure to real bundle files. The main weaknesses are a few tangential convention sections adding tokens and the absence of a concrete minimal-patch edit example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, bullet-driven body that assumes Claude's competence with no padded concept explanations; the BenszAPI task-workspace and bug-collection convention sections add tokens not strictly needed for the core task, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (the validate_guide.py invocation, the /research-guide-updater --guide-path syntax) and a specific section-to-target mapping, but lacks a copy-paste example of an actual minimal-patch edit. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow (先决条件自检 → 抽取原子洞见 → 选择融入位置 → 最小补丁写入 → 更新后校验) with an explicit validation command and error-recovery guidance, satisfying the feedback-loop requirement for file-modifying operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is an overview that points one level deep to a real references/guide-structure-map.md for placement rules and scripts/validate_guide.py for validation, with a Resources table signaling the bundle and easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |