Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body presents a well-sequenced, structured multi-phase workflow with concrete output schemas and error handling, but is padded with redundant and boilerplate sections, lacks executable commands for several key steps, and has incomplete navigation to its own bundle files. Tightening the duplicated sections and wiring up the unreferenced reference files would lift it substantially.
Suggestions
Reference literature-search-guide.md and methodology-extraction-patterns.md from the relevant workflow steps (e.g. 步骤 1.2 and 步骤 2.1), and remove or fix the dangling references to CHANGELOG.md and config.yaml which are not present in the bundle.
Cut the redundant sections (核心价值, 使用场景, 输入规范 duplicating 阶段 0, and the generic 公共硬约束 boilerplate) or move them to a reference file to reduce token overhead.
Make the 校验 step concrete by naming the actual validation command (e.g. python scripts/validate.py with expected inputs/outputs) and adding an explicit validate-fix-retry loop after PDF download and JSON extraction.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core phased process is operational and free of explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but several padded sections could be trimmed: 核心价值/使用场景 duplicate the description, 输入规范 repeats 阶段 0 inputs, ~25 lines of generic 公共硬约束 boilerplate, and the user-facing advice sections add little instructional value. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete artifacts exist (JSON output schemas, scoring thresholds like ≥7 and 15-30 papers, PDF naming formats, named sources like PubMed and Unpaywall), but key execution steps are described rather than instructed (e.g. "AI 语义分析识别 Methods 章节内容"), and implementation-notes.md shows most pipeline scripts are still 'planned', leaving gaps in executable guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is a clearly sequenced four-phase process (阶段 0-3) with per-step 目标/输出, explicit PDF-download error handling (record failed DOIs, do not block), and a failure/recovery Q&A section; however the 校验 step is generic ("执行 Skill 已有的静态检查、脚本验证") without named commands or explicit validate-fix-retry checkpoints, so it falls short of the score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Templates and implementation/script status are deferred one level deep to references/output-templates.md and references/implementation-notes.md, but two of the four reference files (literature-search-guide.md, methodology-extraction-patterns.md) are never referenced from the body, and CHANGELOG.md and config.yaml referenced in the body are absent from the bundle, leaving references partly buried or broken. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |