Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured orchestration guide with concrete paths, project selectors, and verification commands, plus strong boundary discipline. Its main weaknesses are repeated boundary statements that inflate token cost and mapping guidance that stays high-level rather than showing worked examples.
Suggestions
Consolidate the template-protection boundary into one canonical section (硬性边界) and reference it from 输出原则/不适用场景 instead of restating it, to recover token budget and lift conciseness.
Add one worked content-mapping example (e.g., a sample old \section block → target extraTex/xx.tex snippet, plus a .bib entry merge) so the mapping step is copy-paste-ready rather than abstract.
Convert reference paths to markdown links and surface the currently-unlinked bundle files (e.g., migration_patterns.md, structure_mapping_guide.md, troubleshooting.md) in the 参考材料 section to improve navigation and progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of concept-explanation padding, but the template-protection boundary is restated four times (硬性边界, 输出原则, 不适用场景, and the 参考材料 closing) and could be consolidated; fits anchor 3 rather than 4 due to this noticeable redundancy. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete writable paths ("extraTex/**/*.tex" excluding "@config.tex", "references/**/*.bib"), specific project selectors (projects/NSFC_*, projects/paper-sci-01/), and copy-paste-ready build verification commands; falls short of 5 because the content-mapping step stays abstract ("旧正文 → extraTex/*.tex") with no worked snippet. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence with an explicit terminal validation checkpoint (official build commands) and an error feedback loop (build failure → report, do not patch template); not 5 because validation is end-only with no mid-process checkpoints or formal checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview body points to real one-level-deep references (scripts/README.md, references/quickstart.md, config_guide.md, api_reference.md — all verified present), but links use plain paths rather than markdown link syntax and several bundle files (migration_patterns.md, structure_mapping_guide.md, etc.) are not surfaced. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |