transfer-old-latex-to-new

当用户明确要求“迁移 LaTeX 模板”“把旧项目接入 ChineseResearchLaTeX”“把旧标书/论文/毕业论文/简历套进当前模板”“把 Word/PDF/Markdown/零散 tex 整理进现有项目”，或直接提到 `transfer-old-latex-to-new` 时使用。旧别名 `migrating-latex-templates` 可兼容理解。该 skill 只负责把正文内容迁移到当前仓库现有模板的内容层；绝不能修改 `packages/` 内公共包源码、也绝不能修改 `projects/` 内模板样式或入口骨架，只能写入目标项目允许承载正文的内容文件。

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable body with concrete mappings, exact write paths, full build/verification commands, and properly signaled one-level-deep references. The only real weakness is redundant restatement of the template-skeleton boundary across multiple sections, which inflates length without adding information.

Suggestions

Consolidate the 'do not modify template skeleton / packages / projects' boundary into the 硬性边界 section once, and have later sections reference it ('见硬性边界') instead of restating it in 输出原则, step 4, Legacy CLI, and 不适用场景.

Consider moving the per-product-line official build commands (step 5) into a references file (e.g. references/quickstart.md) and keeping only a pointer in SKILL.md, since they are reference material rather than overview content.

The 不适用场景 section substantially overlaps 输入原则/输出原则; merging the 'hand off to make-latex-model' guidance into a single short section would reduce redundancy.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but the 'do not modify the template skeleton' boundary is restated ~5 times (硬性边界, 输出原则, workflow step 4, Legacy CLI, 不适用场景). That redundancy could be tightened, so it sits at level 2 ('mostly efficient but could be tightened') rather than the lean level-3 anchor.	2 / 3
Actionability	Provides concrete, executable guidance: product-line→project mapping (NSFC→projects/NSFC_, SCI→projects/paper-sci-01/), exact writable paths (extraTex//.tex excluding @config.tex, references/*/.bib), and full official build commands. Copy-paste ready and specific, matching the level-3 anchor rather than the pseudocode/incomplete level-2 anchor.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clear 5-step 推荐工作流 with an explicit verification checkpoint (step 5 官方入口验证 with build commands) and failure-handling guidance (report/hand off rather than silently patch). Has explicit validation steps and feedback for error recovery, satisfying level 3; the build verification means it is not capped at 2 for missing validation.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	SKILL.md is an organized overview with a clearly signaled 参考材料 section pointing one level deep to real files (scripts/README.md, references/quickstart.md, config_guide.md, api_reference.md — all verified present). Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references and easy navigation, matching the level-3 anchor.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description: it states concrete actions, enumerates natural user triggers, answers both what and when, and carves out a distinct niche with explicit boundary exclusions. Third-person voice is used throughout with no first/second-person slips.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions and inputs — '把正文内容迁移到当前仓库现有模板的内容层' plus specific source formats (Word/PDF/Markdown/零散 tex) and target types (标书/论文/毕业论文/简历), and explicit write-scope constraints. Matches the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor rather than the partial level-2 anchor.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('该 skill 只负责把正文内容迁移到当前仓库现有模板的内容层') and when ('当用户明确要求…时使用'). The explicit 'Use when' clause with enumerated triggers satisfies the level-3 anchor and avoids the level-2 cap for a missing trigger clause.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Covers natural phrases users would actually say — '迁移 LaTeX 模板', '把旧项目接入 ChineseResearchLaTeX', '把旧标书/论文/毕业论文/简历套进当前模板' — plus the skill name and legacy alias. Good coverage of natural terms, not jargon, so it clears level 3 rather than settling at level 2's 'some relevant keywords'.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	A clear niche (content-layer migration into existing ChineseResearchLaTeX templates) with distinct triggers, reinforced by explicit exclusion boundaries ('绝不能修改 packages/…projects/'). Clearly distinguishable and unlikely to fire for the wrong skill, matching the level-3 anchor rather than the overlapping level-2 anchor.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

81%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning
metadata_field	'metadata' should map string keys to string values	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	13 / 16 Passed

Repository: huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX
Path: skills/transfer-old-latex-to-new/SKILL.md
Commit: 01044a6

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.