CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

weekly-checkin

Cross-domain pattern analysis and strategic reflection for weekly review

Quality

64%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/weekly-checkin/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body provides highly actionable, well-sequenced guidance for an instruction-only skill — concrete commands, paths, questions, and a complete output template, with a verification checklist and termination conditions. Its weaknesses are token efficiency and progressive disclosure: the huge inlined template and padding sections bloat the file, and material that belongs in a reference file lives in SKILL.md.

Suggestions

Move the ~200-line check-in document template to a separate reference file (e.g. references/weekly-checkin-template.md) and replace it in SKILL.md with a short summary of the template's sections and the save path.

Trim or remove the 'Philosophy' and 'Integration with Other Skills' sections — they restate the skill's intent without adding actionable guidance.

Add a concrete method for identifying files 'from the past week' (e.g., filter by frontmatter `created:` date within the last 7 days) so the gather step is executable without inference.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly task-relevant (reflection questions, template, file paths), but the ~200-line check-in document template is inlined in SKILL.md where it belongs in a separate reference file, and sections like 'Philosophy' and 'Integration with Other Skills' add padding. It is more than minor over-explanation (anchor 4) but does not extensively explain concepts Claude already knows (anchor 2).

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete throughout: the exact command `date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M'`, the exact save path `01-daily/checkins/weekly-checkin-YYYY-MM-DD.md`, specific verbatim reflection questions, and a full document template. Minor gaps (e.g., no concrete method for identifying files 'from the past week') keep it below fully executable coverage.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Process Flow gives a clear sequence (Pre-Flight → Gather Context → Guided Reflection → Generate Document → Confirm Completion), and the Loop Engineering section adds an explicit verifier checklist and layered termination conditions. Minor gaps — e.g., no explicit date-range filter for the weekly scan and implicit (rather than step-level) validation — keep it below the anchor with explicit validation steps and error-recovery loops.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized with clear headers, but no bundle files exist and the large document template (~200 lines) is content that should be in a separate reference file inlined in SKILL.md; the only external pointer (`.claude/skills/loop-engineering/SKILL.md`) is to a file outside the bundle. This matches 'content that should be separate is inline' with otherwise decent structure.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description names a clear domain and a couple of actions, but the actions are abstract, there is no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, and natural trigger phrases users would say are missing. It sits squarely at the midpoint of the rubric across all dimensions.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks for their weekly review, says "weekly checkin" or "reflect on my week", or wants to analyze patterns across the week.'

Replace abstract phrasing with concrete capabilities: e.g. 'Guides the user through a weekly reflection conversation across personal, professional, and project domains, analyzes braindumps and daily briefs for recurring themes, and generates a structured weekly check-in document.'

Include the output artifact (a check-in markdown file saved to 01-daily/checkins/) so the skill is distinguishable from other reflection/pattern-analysis skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Cross-domain pattern analysis and strategic reflection" names 1-2 actions, but they are abstract rather than concrete — the actual deliverables (guided reflection conversation, generated check-in document, scanning braindumps/briefs) are not mentioned. It names the domain ('weekly review') with a couple of actions, matching the anchor for a clear domain plus limited actions, not the anchor listing several specific actions.

3 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is present and reasonably clear ('Cross-domain pattern analysis and strategic reflection'), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent; "for weekly review" only weakly implies when. Per the guideline, a missing explicit trigger clause caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"weekly review" is a natural term a user would say, but common variations like 'weekly checkin', 'reflect on my week', or 'week in review' are absent. Some relevant keywords exist while common synonyms are missing, which matches the middle anchor rather than good coverage (4) or generic-only (2).

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Cross-domain pattern analysis and strategic reflection" could overlap with sibling reflection skills (daily check-ins, monthly reviews, knowledge consolidation), though the "weekly review" scope narrows it. It is somewhat specific but could still overlap with similar skills, matching the middle anchor.

3 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

huytieu/COG-second-brain

Path

.claude/skills/weekly-checkin/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.