Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written, highly actionable audit workflow with explicit sequencing and validation checkpoints, supported by a single well-signaled reference file. Its only gap is minor cross-section redundancy that slightly dents conciseness.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 're-open every cited source' instruction into one stated practice so sections 3, 4, and 6 reference it rather than restating it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no re-teaching of concepts Claude knows, but the instruction to 're-open every cited source' recurs across sections 3, 4, and 6, introducing minor redundancy that could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: exact markdown templates for 'Design language' and a findings table with required columns, plus precise decision criteria (Contract, Runtime, Correction) and hard rules like 'Stop at three' and 'Delete any finding that does not include every required column'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The audit is a clearly numbered six-step sequence (Select → Reconstruct → Prove → Vet → Report → Specify) with explicit validation checkpoints: a three-proof gate in section 3 and a falsification pass that deletes unsupported candidates in section 4. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a well-organized process overview that signals one clearly-named, one-level-deep reference ('Read [references/plan-template.md]') to a real bundle file for the detailed plan format, keeping the overview navigable. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |