CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

exam-ready

Prepare a concise exam review from study materials and a syllabus supplied by the user. Use for topic summaries, recall questions, MCQ cues, and time-limited revision plans that must stay grounded in those materials.

66

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tightly written, highly actionable instruction skill with a concrete output template and explicit guardrails for missing inputs and time constraints. Its weaknesses are minor: slight redundancy between the early 'Do NOT' lines and the Rules section, and no external-reference split worth doing for a single-purpose skill.

Suggestions

Consolidate the 'Do NOT explain...' lines with the Rules section to remove the duplicated grounding constraint and tighten conciseness.

Add an explicit final validation step (e.g. 'before finishing, confirm every syllabus topic was addressed or flagged as not-found') to give the workflow a clear completion checkpoint.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, but the 'Do NOT...' block in the first section overlaps with the Rules section ('Stay strictly within the provided material'), leaving minor trimmable repetition.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides a fully concrete, copy-ready per-topic output template, exact fallback phrases for every missing-input case, and explicit numbered triage steps — instruction-only guidance that is specific and immediately executable.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The process is clearly sequenced (triage priority list, then expand in priority order) with explicit guardrails for missing topics and PDF/syllabus mismatches; it is not a destructive or batch operation, so the cap does not apply, but there is no explicit output-validation checkpoint to reach 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (What this skill does, Input format, Handling missing inputs, Triage mode, Output format, Rules, Trigger phrases) with no nested references; at ~95 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception that would warrant a 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete, and clearly distinct, naming several concrete capabilities alongside an explicit use clause. Its main gap is the absence of natural, user-spoken trigger phrases that would lift completeness and trigger-term quality to the top anchor.

Suggestions

Add a concrete 'Use when the user says things like "I have an exam tomorrow on...", "quiz me on...", or "go through my syllabus"' clause to strengthen trigger-term quality and completeness.

Consider mentioning the accepted inputs (PDF or pasted notes) in the description to make the 'what' even more concrete and reduce ambiguity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('topic summaries, recall questions, MCQ cues, time-limited revision plans') plus 'Prepare a concise exam review', giving specific coverage with only minor gaps, just below the comprehensive 5 anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (prepare exam review from materials and a syllabus) and 'when' ('Use for topic summaries, recall questions, MCQ cues, and time-limited revision plans'); falls short of 5 because the 'when' lacks concrete trigger phrases.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant terms ('exam review', 'recall questions', 'MCQ cues', 'revision plans') give good keyword coverage, though the most natural user phrases (e.g. 'I have an exam tomorrow', 'quiz me') are absent from the description itself.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche (exam prep grounded strictly in user-supplied materials and a syllabus) with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
iflytek/skillhub
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.