Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable conventions reference with concrete commands and paths and a verification checkpoint in its main workflow. Minor gaps (no worked component example, no retry loop, and a dangling script reference) keep each dimension at 4 rather than 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean, reference-style set of rules, tables, and commands that assumes Claude's competence; only minor trims (the HMR aside and the long dependency list) keep it below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete copy-paste `make` commands, specific file paths, and named libraries give mostly executable guidance, but the absence of a worked React/FSD component example leaves a minor gap versus fully covering the common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The API type-generation workflow has a clear sequence with an explicit verify step ('./scripts/check-openapi-generated.sh'), but it lacks an explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop, so it stops short of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections and tables are well-organized in a single coherent conventions file with no bundle to navigate; it falls below 5 because the referenced './scripts/check-openapi-generated.sh' is not present as a bundle file and the dependencies list is slightly long. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |