Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced CLI reference with strong validation checkpoints on destructive operations. Its weaknesses are repeated guardrail guidance across sections and a monolithic single-file structure that would benefit from splitting detail into reference files.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the preflight/read-state/preserve-receipts rules: state them once in 'Supported task contract' and reference that section from the intro and Best Practices instead of restating.
Move time-sensitive/version-specific notes (e.g. 'Ledger 0.3.x exposes...') into a clearly labeled compatibility/version section so they can be maintained without bloating the core reference.
Split the bulky archive-pack, controller-routing, and environment-variable sections into separate reference files (e.g. ARCHIVE.md, ROUTING.md) and link to them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean reference material assuming Claude's competence, but the preflight/read-state/preserve-receipts guidance is repeated across the intro, 'Supported task contract', and 'Best Practices', and version-specific statements ('Ledger 0.3.x exposes...') sit outside any 'deprecated/old patterns' section — more than minor trimming needed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Every command group ships copy-paste-ready invocations with concrete options and filters (e.g. 'yy ledger mark done --id TASK_ID --response "..." --commit abc123def'), fully covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Destructive/batch flows are explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints and feedback loops — the archive-pack section requires preflight + owner authorization + clean repo/index, independent inspection of the plan, and 'fail closed: discard the plan, resolve the conflict, and plan again' on stale-plan/conflict; the merge flow is dry-run plan → review → apply → retain receipt. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers give reasonable structure, but this 177-line SKILL.md inlines large blocks that clearly belong in separate reference files (immutable archive packs, controller routing, env vars) and signals zero external references — no bundle files exist — so it lands at 'some structure, content that should be separate is inline'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |