retrieval-practice-generator

Generate low-stakes retrieval-practice questions with grounded answer notes and implementation guidance. Use for quiz starters, revision activities, delayed recall, misconception checks, or adapting recall difficulty.

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, token-efficient instruction-only skill with concrete question types, a sequenced workflow, an explicit output template, and built-in validation via quality checks. The only gap is the absence of a fully worked example to anchor the template.

Suggestions

Add one short worked example (a sample question with its answer note and use plan) to make the output template immediately copy-paste ready.

Make the validation checkpoints in the workflow more explicit (e.g., a distinct 'Verify' step mirroring the Quality checks) to tighten workflow clarity.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Lean and efficient throughout: no padding, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every section (safety, inputs, types, workflow, output, checks, limitations) earns its place.	5 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete, specific guidance — four named question types with selection criteria, a 7-step workflow, and a full output template with field structure; stops just short of a fully worked example covering a common case.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The 7-step workflow is clearly sequenced and paired with a 'Quality checks' section that acts as validation checkpoints (e.g., question does not reveal the answer, answerable from authorized material); a couple of checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized into clearly labeled single-level sections with no nested or buried references and no need for external bundle files; navigation is straightforward.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states both what the skill does and when to use it, with natural trigger phrases and a distinct niche. It is just shy of fully comprehensive on enumerated concrete actions and trigger synonyms.

Suggestions

Add one or two more discrete concrete actions (e.g., 'produce an answer key' or 'build a use plan') to push specificity toward comprehensive coverage.

Include a couple more natural trigger variations or synonyms a learner/teacher might say (e.g., 'study questions', 'recall drills') to round out trigger term quality.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and several concrete actions ('Generate low-stakes retrieval-practice questions with grounded answer notes and implementation guidance', 'adapting recall difficulty'), but the action list could enumerate a few more discrete capabilities to reach comprehensive coverage.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both 'what' (generate retrieval-practice questions with grounded answer notes and implementation guidance) and 'when' ('Use for quiz starters, revision activities, delayed recall, misconception checks, or adapting recall difficulty') with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural phrases users would actually say ('quiz starters, revision activities, delayed recall, misconception checks'), with good synonym coverage; a few common variations are still missing.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear niche (retrieval-practice question generation) with distinct, education-specific triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: iflytek/skillhub
Path: builtin-skills/skills/retrieval-practice-generator/SKILL.md
Commit: 7352597

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.