Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid design system reference skill with clear semantic structure using MUST/SHOULD/NEVER conventions and well-organized tables. Its main weaknesses are the lack of executable implementation examples (CSS/Tailwind snippets) and some redundancy in reference data. The content would benefit from splitting detailed reference tables into separate files and adding at least one concrete code example showing how to apply these constraints.
Suggestions
Add 1-2 executable code examples (e.g., a Tailwind config snippet or CSS custom properties block) showing how to implement the design tokens
Move detailed reference tables (full text styles list, font sizes, border-radius scale) into a separate REFERENCE.md file and link to it
Remove redundant information like the border-radius scale appearing twice and the 'Count' column that shows '1' for every text style entry
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient with clear tables and MUST/SHOULD/NEVER constraints, but includes some redundancy (e.g., border-radius scale listed twice, font sizes listed separately from the text styles table, multiple 14px text-style entries with minimal differentiation). The 'Count' column showing '1' for every entry adds no value. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides specific values (hex codes, pixel sizes, font weights) which are concrete and actionable for styling, but lacks executable code examples showing how to implement these in actual CSS/Tailwind/React. The guidance is specific enough to act on but would benefit from at least one implementation snippet. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a reference/constraint skill rather than a multi-step workflow, so the single-purpose nature applies. The content is clearly organized by concern (colors, typography, spacing, etc.) with unambiguous MUST/SHOULD/NEVER directives that make the decision process clear. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear sections and tables, but at ~150 lines it's becoming a wall of reference data that could benefit from splitting detailed token tables and typography references into separate files. No external references are provided for deeper exploration. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |