Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a reasonably well-structured design system reference with specific, concrete values (colors, typography, spacing) and clear constraint language (MUST/SHOULD/NEVER). Its main weaknesses are the lack of executable code examples showing how to implement these tokens, some raw-audit-output artifacts that could be cleaned up, and an empty Components section that suggests incompleteness. Adding code snippets and splitting detailed reference tables into separate files would improve it significantly.
Suggestions
Add at least one executable code example (e.g., a CSS custom properties block or Tailwind config) showing how to apply the design tokens
Remove or complete the empty '## Components' section, and clean up raw audit artifacts like '(used 7x)' and the duplicate `text-14px` entries
Consider extracting the detailed reference tables (Semantic Tokens, Text Styles) into a separate REFERENCE.md file and linking to it, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview
Add a brief workflow or checklist for applying the design system to a new component (e.g., 1. Set base tokens → 2. Apply typography scale → 3. Verify contrast ratios → 4. Check spacing grid alignment)
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient with well-structured tables and clear MUST/SHOULD/NEVER constraints. However, some redundancy exists (e.g., `text-primary` and `accent` both map to #729AE0, duplicate `text-14px` entries, 'Count' column adds little value). The 'Detected Layout Patterns' section and some metadata like '(used 7x)' feel like raw audit output rather than curated guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides specific values (hex codes, pixel sizes, font weights) which are concrete and actionable for implementation. However, it lacks any executable code examples — no CSS snippets, no Tailwind config, no component templates. For a UI design system skill, at least one concrete code example showing how to apply these tokens would significantly improve actionability. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The content is organized as a reference document with clear categorical sections, which is appropriate for a design system. However, there's no guidance on the workflow of applying these constraints — no sequence for building a component, no validation steps to check compliance. The 'When to Apply' section is minimal and doesn't guide through a process. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-sectioned with clear headers and tables, making it scannable. However, it's a fairly long monolithic document (~130 lines of dense reference material) with no references to external files for detailed topics like component patterns or examples. The empty '## Components' section suggests incomplete organization. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |