Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a reasonably well-structured design system reference with clear semantic tokens, typography specs, and constraint-based rules (MUST/SHOULD/NEVER). Its main weaknesses are the lack of executable code examples showing implementation, some redundant reference data that reads like raw audit output, and the monolithic structure that could benefit from splitting detailed tables into separate reference files.
Suggestions
Add concrete code examples (CSS custom properties, Tailwind config, or React component snippets) showing how to implement the design tokens — e.g., a card component using surface-raised, border-default, and the 20px border-radius.
Remove redundant sections like the 'Border Radius Reference' that repeats the scale already listed above, and the 'Typography Reference' font families/sizes already covered in the Text Styles table.
Split detailed token tables and typography references into separate files (e.g., TOKENS.md, TYPOGRAPHY.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with links to these references.
Flesh out the Components section with more variants and actual implementation code — the single Ghost button variant with mostly empty fields provides minimal value.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient with well-structured tables and clear MUST/SHOULD/NEVER constraints, but includes some redundancy (e.g., border-radius scale listed twice, typography reference repeating font families/sizes already shown in the table). The detected counts ('used 26x', 'currently 20 colors detected') feel like audit artifacts rather than actionable guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides specific hex values, pixel sizes, and concrete constraints (MUST/SHOULD/NEVER), which is good. However, there are no executable code examples showing how to implement these tokens in CSS/Tailwind/React, no component code snippets, and the button component table has only one variant with mostly empty fields. The guidance describes what to use but rarely shows how. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | For a design system reference skill, there's no multi-step workflow needed, but the content lacks any guidance on how to apply these tokens in practice — no implementation sequence, no validation steps for checking contrast ratios or grid alignment. The 'When to Apply' section is helpful but minimal. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear section headers and tables, making it scannable. However, it's quite long (~150 lines of dense reference material) and could benefit from splitting detailed token tables and typography references into separate files, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview with links. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |