lorem-ipsum
Generate lorem ipsum placeholder text. This skill should be used when users ask to generate lorem ipsum content, placeholder text, dummy text, or filler text. Supports various structures including plain paragraphs, headings with sections, lists, and continuous text. Output can be saved to a file or used directly as requested by the user.
88
82%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
100%
3.33xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly communicates what the skill does, when it should be used, and includes excellent trigger term coverage with natural variations like 'lorem ipsum', 'placeholder text', 'dummy text', and 'filler text'. The description also specifies supported output structures, adding useful detail without being verbose. Minor note: it uses third person voice appropriately throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions and structures: 'plain paragraphs, headings with sections, lists, and continuous text' as well as output options like saving to file or using directly. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Generate lorem ipsum placeholder text' with supported structures) and when ('when users ask to generate lorem ipsum content, placeholder text, dummy text, or filler text') with an explicit 'Use when' clause. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'lorem ipsum', 'placeholder text', 'dummy text', 'filler text'. These are all common variations a user might naturally use when requesting this functionality. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very clear niche — lorem ipsum / placeholder text generation is a distinct task unlikely to conflict with other skills. The trigger terms are highly specific to this particular use case. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid, actionable skill with clear executable commands and good coverage of the generator script's capabilities. Its main weaknesses are redundancy between the usage examples and the Examples section, and a workflow that lacks validation/error handling steps. Trimming duplicate content and adding basic verification guidance would elevate this skill significantly.
Suggestions
Remove the Examples section or consolidate it with the Basic Usage/Structured Content sections to eliminate redundancy and save tokens.
Add a brief error handling note to the Workflow section (e.g., 'If the script fails, check that scripts/generate.py exists and uv is available; verify output length matches expectations').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient but has redundancy — the Examples section largely repeats what's already shown in Basic Usage and Structured Content sections. The All Options table also duplicates information from the usage examples. Could be tightened by removing the Examples section or the earlier usage blocks. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Every example is a fully executable bash command with specific flags and arguments. The options table is comprehensive, and the mapping from user requests to commands is explicit and copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow section lists steps but lacks validation checkpoints — there's no guidance on what to do if the script fails, if the output doesn't match expectations, or how to verify the generated content meets the user's requirements. For a simple generation task this is mostly adequate but the absence of any error handling or verification keeps it at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear sections and headers, but it's somewhat monolithic — the extensive examples and full options table could be in a separate reference file. For a skill of this length (~100 lines of content), the inline approach is borderline acceptable but the repetition between sections suggests better organization is possible. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- intellectronica/agent-skills
- Commit
9b0e00a
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.