Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered skill body: two clearly sequenced workflows with mandatory script-validated feedback loops, exact naming conventions and commands, and a clean split where all reusable HTML lives in reference libraries rather than the main file. The only weaknesses are moderate rule duplication between workflow steps and the Gotchas section, and a genre→theme mapping inlined in step 1 that duplicates theme-index.md.
Suggestions
Remove the six-bullet genre→theme mapping in step 1 and rely solely on theme-index.md's '适用场景' column (already cited as the single source), to avoid the two lists drifting apart.
Consolidate the duplicated dashed-border, per-paragraph underline, and signature rules: state each rule once in its workflow step and let Gotchas reference it, or keep details only in Gotchas.
Reconcile SKILL.md's '主动推荐制' step 1 with theme-index.md's '选择建议' section (which describes a user-selection default), so the two files prescribe the same selection behavior.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and domain-specific (paste behavior, <span leaf> wrapping, platform bans, full-width punctuation) with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but several rules are stated twice — the dashed-border rule appears in step 4 ("强调与小标题用'小标签/左竖条'，不要用虚线框") and again in Gotchas, the per-paragraph underline rule appears in 智能处理 #3 and Gotchas, and the signature rules span #6/#7 and Gotchas. This fits 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'; it is above 3 because almost every token is non-obvious domain knowledge, and below 5 because the duplication could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: concrete script invocations ("<SKILL_ROOT>/scripts/validate_gzh_html.py <生成的.html 的实际路径>", "scripts/wrap_preview.py", "component_lint.py ."), an exact output-file naming convention, an element→component mapping table, and explicit 'take HTML from the component libraries, never hand-write' with the library files named. This matches the 'fully executable; copy-paste ready commands; covers common cases' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–6 are clearly sequenced with a mandatory validation checkpoint ("必须运行校验脚本，ERROR 清零才算完成") and an explicit feedback loop ("报 ERROR 就回到第 4 步修"), plus a second validated workflow (custom theme generation ending in component_lint to 0 ERROR) and a Gotchas checklist. This matches the anchor 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery; checklists'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle structure is excellent: SKILL.md holds only process/decisions, all HTML lives in references/ (theme-index as declared single source, per-theme libraries, common-components, format-normalize, theme-generator, eval-cases), every referenced path exists, and links are clearly signaled inline. It falls short of 5 because step 1 inlines the full genre→theme mapping (six bullets) that duplicates theme-index.md's '适用场景' column — inline content that belongs in the reference and can drift out of sync — fitting 'good structure; most content appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |