Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable orchestration reference: routing is unambiguous, call syntax is concrete, and system constraints are explicit. Its main weakness is the absence of validation/error-recovery checkpoints around subagent results, particularly in the batch parallel fan-out workflow, plus some duplicated routing content.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification loop to the 并行扇出-汇总 workflow: after results return, check each stream's terminal state (output-error → correct via SendMessage or re-dispatch) before summarizing, and include one concrete recovery example.
Replace the "..." prompt placeholder in the Agent call example with one complete, well-formed delegation prompt so the expected instruction quality is concrete.
Consolidate the subagent routing logic that currently appears in three places (委派决策 tree, 六个内置子代理 table, 常见误判) to remove duplication and cut tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and information-rich — routing tables, call syntax, and hard limits with almost no concept-explanation padding ("委派本身会引入上下文传递开销和额外步数，小任务得不偿失" earns its place). Subagent routing appears three times (委派决策 tree, 六个内置子代理 table, 常见误判), which is minor duplication that could be trimmed, keeping it below the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, mostly executable guidance: exact call skeletons ("Agent { description: \"爬取 A 站产品表\", prompt: \"...\", subagent_type: \"browser\" }", "SendMessage { toolCallId: \"agent-xxx\", message: ... }") plus parameter tables and specific limits (depth 2, concurrency 4). Minor gaps: prompt fields are "..." placeholders with no example of a well-formed delegation prompt, and no guidance for handling the "output-error" state it names. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are clear (decision tree; fan-out "拆解任务 → 并行发出 → 各自同步返回 → 汇总") but validation checkpoints are absent — the state flow "output-streaming → output-available | output-error" is mentioned with no recovery step, and the batch parallel fan-out workflow includes no verification of subagent results before summarizing. Per the rubric, missing validation in a batch operation caps this at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned single-file skill (~125 lines) with clear headers (工具清单, 委派决策, 六个内置子代理, Agent 工具调用, SendMessage, 并行扇出-汇总, 上下文继承, 系统硬限制, 常见误判) and no nested or buried references. It exceeds the 50-line simple-skill threshold and some reference-grade tables could live in a separate file, so it is not a 5, but structure and placement are good. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |