Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, highly actionable internal product manual: concrete UI paths, a verbatim-error-keyed decision tree, security rules with rationale, and correct/wrong answer contrasts. Remaining gaps are minor — slight overlap between the answer-strategy and error-example sections, no recovery loop when guidance fails, and a troubleshooting tree that could be offloaded to a reference file.
Suggestions
Merge 回答策略 point 2 with the 常见错误示范 table (or drop the redundant prose) so the 'give exact paths, never say 去设置里找找' rule is stated once.
Split the 故障排查决策树 into references/troubleshooting.md, keeping SKILL.md as a configuration-map overview that links to it, which would shorten the always-loaded body.
Add a terminal fallback step to 回答策略 for when the guided setting does not fix the issue (e.g., collect the exact error message and version, then check the decision tree again or escalate).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, product-specific knowledge Claude could not infer (UI paths, proxy example, privacy model) with essentially no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. However, there is minor redundancy: 回答策略 point 2 ("给出具体路径，不要说'去设置里找找'") restates what the 常见错误示范 table already demonstrates, fitting the level-4 'efficient with minor trimmable instances' anchor rather than level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every answer is copy-paste concrete: exact UI navigation chains ("设置 → AI 模型 → Provider 管理 → 点击对应 Provider → 编辑 API Key"), a literal proxy example ("http://127.0.0.1:7890"), a correct/wrong answer table, and a decision tree keyed on verbatim error messages. As an instruction-only skill, its guidance is fully actionable and covers the common cases, matching the level-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 回答策略 section gives a clear 4-step sequence (identify intent → consult map → give path / walk decision tree → API-key handling) and the 兜底规则 provides an explicit fallback for unmapped requests. No validation loop exists for the case where guided settings still fail to resolve the user's issue, which sits it at level 4 ('clear sequence, most checkpoints, minor gaps') rather than 5; the destructive/batch cap does not apply since the skill is informational. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single file is well-sectioned with no nested or buried references, and there are no bundle files, so nothing is misfiled. At ~90 lines the body exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception, and the troubleshooting tree covering six product areas (邮件/日历、终端、编辑器、文件管理器、界面) is a plausible candidate for an on-demand references/ file, placing it at level 4 ('good structure, most content appropriately placed') rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |