Conciseness

Roughly 15 lines with zero padding: every line is dense instruction (field lists, exact status strings, verdict-to-action mappings) and nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. Fully matches the "lean and efficient; every token earns its place" anchor.

Actionability

Concrete, executable guidance for an instruction-only skill — step 1 enumerates the exact fields of templates/fix-claim.json, step 2 gives exact status strings, step 6 gives verdict-specific actions. Minor gaps keep it below 5: how to invoke the "claim auditor", where the recipe library and ledger live, and the location of the referenced template are unspecified.

Workflow Clarity

A clear 6-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint ("Run the claim auditor on the report; zero flags required") and per-verdict feedback loops (NOT FIXED → root cause; PARTIALLY FIXED → extend sweep; regression → revert first), plus an exit-criteria section. Matches the 5 anchor's explicit validation and error-recovery loops.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is short and well-sectioned, but its primary artifact — "Fill `templates/fix-claim.json`" — is referenced yet absent from the bundle (no templates/, references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist), so navigation to the key referenced material fails. Better than the inlined-content problem of 2, but the dangling core reference prevents a 4.

Specificity

Enumerates concrete payload items ("complete fix claim, honest status, deployed fingerprint, rollback plan, and a Done-Gate–compliant report") plus the follow-on action "react to the verdict" — several specific actions with minor gaps (e.g., running the claim auditor is not mentioned). It exceeds the 3 anchor (only 1-2 concrete actions) but is essentially two top-level verbs with an enumerated payload, short of the comprehensive multi-action coverage of the 5 anchor.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("Hand a fix to the independent verifier with a complete fix claim... then react to the verdict") and when ("Use after the regression proof passes, and whenever reporting fix status to anyone") with concrete trigger conditions. Both halves are explicit and specific, matching the 5 anchor.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would say in this workflow — "fix", "regression proof passes", "reporting fix status" — but misses common variations such as "handoff", "deployed", or "QA verdict". Good coverage, not comprehensive, so it sits at 4 rather than 5 and clearly above the sparse keyword coverage of 3.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche — fix handoff to an independent verifier in Done-Gate form — with distinct trigger conditions (regression proof passed, reporting fix status) and an explicit counterpart skill (qa-release-gate), so conflict risk is minimal.