Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction-only skill: efficient, concrete, and clearly sequenced with a completeness gate, tester feedback loop, and an exit-criteria checklist. The main gaps are unresolved references (a Fix Recipe Library that isn't in the bundle) and undefined severity vocabulary (P0–P3).
Suggestions
Resolve the Fix Recipe Library reference: either ship it as a bundle file (e.g. references/fix-recipe-library.md) and cite its path in step 5, or inline a one-line matching rule for how to pick the recipe for a cluster.
Define the severity levels used in the ordering rule (step 4), e.g. one line stating what qualifies a bug as P0 vs P1, so the P0 → unblockers → P1 → P2 → P3 sequence is executable without guessing.
Give the counterpart reference a concrete location or context (e.g. a path to the qa-bug-reporting skill) so the pointer is resolvable rather than a bare name.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean 14 lines: "1. Check every record has steps, an expected result tied to a requirement, evidence, a build fingerprint, a reproduction count, and a failing regression test. Return incomplete records to the tester as INCOMPLETE-RECORD; do not guess." No concept Claude already knows is explained, no padding exists, and every token carries instruction. Matches 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly concrete, executable guidance: record fields are enumerated ("steps, an expected result tied to a requirement, evidence, a build fingerprint, a reproduction count, and a failing regression test"), clustering criteria are specific ("the same function, the same missing control (ownership check, redirect guard, idempotency store, serializer)"), and ordering is exact ("P0 → unblockers → P1 → P2 → P3"). Not 5: two steps leave key details unspecified — "Attach the matching entry from the Fix Recipe Library" gives no location or matching rule (and no such file exists in the bundle), and severity levels (P0–P3) are referenced but never defined. Not 3: the guidance is specific and directly executable, well above pseudocode-level hints. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation and recovery: step 1 is a completeness gate ("Return incomplete records to the tester as INCOMPLETE-RECORD; do not guess") acting as a feedback loop back to the tester, and the Exit criteria section specifies the full output checklist ("cluster | bug IDs | severity | unblocks | recipe | approval needed | order"). Matches 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops...; checklists'. The batch-operation cap does not apply because per-record validation and an output checklist are both present. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized short-form skill: sections "## Procedure" and "## Exit criteria" are cleanly split, under 50 lines, with nothing inlined that belongs elsewhere. Not 5: two references are dangling — "the Fix Recipe Library" has no path and no corresponding bundle file exists (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), and "Counterpart of tester skill: `qa-bug-reporting`" likewise points to nothing resolvable. Not 3: the structure itself is good and no oversized content is inline. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |