Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, brief overview with good progressive disclosure and a clear sequenced workflow. The main weaknesses are redundant trigger phrasing that duplicates the description and high-level actionability that leans on the reference for concrete detail.
Suggestions
Trim or remove the 'When to use this skill' bullet list since those triggers already appear in the frontmatter description, keeping only any genuinely new variations.
Add one or two concrete inline specifics to the workflow steps (e.g., the MADR section headings or the exact output filename/location) so the body is actionable before the reference is loaded.
State the ADR output file path/naming convention explicitly in step 3 so Claude knows where to write the artifact.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient, but the 'When to use this skill' section lists 17 trigger phrases that largely duplicate the frontmatter description, and 'What is covered' repeats information that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It names a concrete file to load and a concrete MADR template, but the workflow steps are high-level ('elicit', 'summarize', 'create') with the actionable detail offloaded to the reference rather than given inline. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence with an explicit confirmation checkpoint (step 2) before artifact creation, plus edge-case 'stop and ask' handling; feedback loops are not critical for this conversational, non-destructive skill. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that points to one real, one-level-deep reference file, signaled both in the workflow and a dedicated Reference section, with content appropriately split. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |