Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, validation-aware planning workflow with clean progressive disclosure, weakened mainly by repetition of the /create-spec issue-mode rules and a lack of inline artifact examples. Tightening the duplication and adding a minimal proposal/tasks template would raise it.
Suggestions
State the /create-spec issue-mode completeness rules once (in Workflow Step 1) and have the Constraints MUST bullets reference that detail instead of repeating it verbatim, to reduce token redundancy.
Add a minimal inline example of a proposal.md/spec delta and the single tasks.md checklist so artifact authoring is actionable without opening the reference.
Merge the four /create-spec-related MUST bullets in Constraints into one consolidated rule to further cut repetition.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly operational, but the /create-spec issue-mode completeness rules are repeated near-verbatim across the Constraints MUST bullets and Workflow Step 1 (and again in the reference), so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete CLI commands are present ('openspec --version', 'openspec new change <change-id>', 'openspec validate --all'), but the artifact-authoring steps give direction without inline examples or templates, leaving key details to the reference. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly numbered steps with explicit validation checkpoints — the completeness stop-gate, 'openspec validate --all', and user-approval gates before multi-change maps and archiving — plus a feedback loop for conflicting sources. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a concise overview with a well-signaled, one-level-deep Reference section pointing to the real references/042-planning-openspec.md; content is appropriately split. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |