Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured overview with concrete commands, a clearly sequenced interactive workflow, and a single verified deep reference. The only weakness is mild redundancy from repeating the full no-ingest enumeration across sections.
Suggestions
Define the no-ingest field list ('issue, milestone, body, comment, title, label, or summary text') once and refer to it as 'issue prose' or 'the no-ingest list' in later sections to reduce token repetition.
Collapse the duplicated constraint bullets between the 'Constraints' and 'Workflow' sections into a single authoritative list to avoid restating the same rules twice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the verbatim enumeration 'issue, milestone, body, comment, title, label, or summary text' is repeated several times across the Constraints and Workflow sections and could be tightened without losing meaning. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable commands (`gh --version`, `gh auth status`, `gh auth login`, `command -v gh`) and specific numbered workflow steps rather than vague direction, matching the level-3 copy-paste-ready anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step workflow is clearly sequenced and the interactive install gate uses explicit STOP -> ask -> wait checkpoints with an accepted-fallback branch, providing the validation feedback loop the rubric rewards. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md body is a concise overview pointing to a single, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference (`references/043-planning-github-issues.md`, verified to exist), so for a small skill the structure is appropriate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |