Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with a clear workflow, explicit compile/verify checkpoints, and a clean one-level reference split. Its weaker points are conciseness (the 'What is covered' and 'When to use' sections duplicate the description and constraints are restated) and actionability (executable test code is deferred entirely to the reference).
Suggestions
Collapse the 'What is covered in this Skill?' and 'When to use this skill' bullet lists, which largely restate the frontmatter description, into a single concise trigger list to remove duplication and tighten conciseness.
Dedupe the constraint block — the .feature-file precondition is stated twice and the compile-before rule appears as both 'MANDATORY' and 'PREREQUISITE'; keep one canonical statement of each.
Add one minimal inline code anchor (e.g. a stub *AT class shell showing @QuarkusTest + extends BaseAcceptanceTest + a REST Assured given/when/then) so the body is actionable without forcing a trip to the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but it is padded with duplication: the 'What is covered' and 'When to use' bullet lists repeat much of the description, and constraints are restated multiple times ('PRECONDITION ... stop and ask if not provided' appears twice; 'MANDATORY compile before' and 'PREREQUISITE must compile' are near-duplicates), so it could be tightened to reach the level-3 'lean' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete commands are present ('./mvnw compile', './mvnw clean verify', classpath 'wiremock/mappings/' with '__files/') and the Given/When/Then plus *AT naming guidance is specific, but the executable test scaffolding (BaseAcceptanceTest, REST Assured calls, WireMock mapping JSON) lives only in the reference rather than the body, leaving the body at the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' level. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow has explicit validation checkpoints — a MANDATORY compile-before gate, a 'BLOCKING CONDITION' that compilation errors must be resolved before proceeding, and a VERIFY step running 'clean verify' — providing the feedback loop the rubric rewards for scaffolding-style operations, matching the level-3 anchor rather than the checkpoint-missing level-2 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The ~60-line body is a concise overview that points to a single real reference file (references/423-frameworks-quarkus-testing-acceptance-tests.md, confirmed present) one level deep, signaled both in Workflow step 1 and a dedicated Reference section with a markdown link, with no nested references — matching the level-3 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |