Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with a clear validated workflow and a properly signaled one-level reference, but it loses points on conciseness (duplicated trigger and constraint lists) and actionability (ADR-generation specifics are deferred to the reference rather than surfaced inline). It is a competent interactive-skill body that would benefit from de-duplication and a small inline output skeleton.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated "When to use this skill" list (it already lives in the frontmatter description) and fold the MANDATORY/MUST bullets into the corresponding workflow steps to eliminate repeated constraint text.
Add a compact inline ADR skeleton or field list (e.g., Context, Decision, Quality Metrics, Success Criteria) so document generation does not depend entirely on opening the reference.
Consolidate the separate "Constraints" section into the workflow steps where the constraints naturally apply, keeping the body a single lean overview pointing to the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and free of concept padding, but there is notable duplication — the "When to use this skill" list repeats triggers already in the frontmatter description, and the "Constraints" MANDATORY/MUST bullets restate constraints already embedded in the Workflow steps — so it sits at "mostly efficient but could be tightened" rather than the fully lean level-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete in places ("Use the local shell date command", a named reference path, "Pose one or two discovery questions at a time", "Validate summary with user"), but the actual ADR-generation specifics are deferred entirely to the bundled reference, leaving the SKILL.md body with directional rather than copy-paste-ready instruction, matching the level-2 anchor; it is not level 3 because no inline template or concrete output structure is given. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (steps 0–3) with explicit validation checkpoints — "Validate summary with user ... before proposing ADR generation" and "Wait for user to confirm proceed before generating the ADR" — plus a confirm-before-proceed feedback loop, matching the top anchor; it is above level 2 because checkpoints are explicit rather than merely implied. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a concise overview with a single clearly-signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/032-architecture-adr-non-functional-requirements.md, verified to exist) referenced both in Workflow step 1 and a dedicated Reference section, matching the top anchor; it is not level 2 because navigation is clear and no content is mis-placed inline. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |