Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured skill body: clear workflow with before/after validation checkpoints and exemplary one-level-deep progressive disclosure to a single reference file. The main cost is redundancy — 'What is covered' and 'When to use this skill' are nearly parallel bullet lists that also echo the frontmatter description — and no inline code example despite ample room for one.
Suggestions
Merge 'What is covered in this Skill?' and 'When to use this skill' into a single bullet list (or drop one entirely) — they are near-duplicates of each other and of the frontmatter description, saving ~10 lines without losing information.
Delete the 'Scope' paragraph, which only restates that guidance comes from the reference file already linked in the Reference section and workflow step 1.
Add one small inline example (e.g., an @ApplicationModuleTest snippet or an ApplicationModules.verify() architecture test) in workflow step 3 so the body demonstrates the pattern before deferring details to the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but duplicates content: the 'What is covered in this Skill?' bullets and the 'When to use this skill' bullets are near-parallel lists, and both largely repeat the frontmatter trigger list. The 'Scope' line also re-states what the Reference section already says. This fits 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' better than the minor-trim anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands and APIs are given ('./mvnw compile', 'mvn clean verify', 'ApplicationModules.verify()', '@ApplicationModuleTest') and each workflow step names specific artifacts to inspect or apply. The gap keeping it below 5 is that all actual patterns (package layouts, annotations, test code) live in the reference file, so the body alone offers no copy-paste example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints: 'MANDATORY: Run ./mvnw compile... before applying any change', 'VERIFY: Run ./mvnw clean verify... after applying improvements', and 'SAFETY: If compilation fails, stop immediately'. It sits at anchor 4 rather than 5 because there is no fix-and-retry recovery loop (failure means stop), and step 4's 'Execute appropriate build/tests' leaves the exact test invocation implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a lean overview with a single well-signaled reference: 'Read references/305-frameworks-spring-boot-modulith.md' in workflow step 1, a 'BEFORE APPLYING' pointer in Constraints, and a dedicated Reference section with a markdown link. The bundle contains exactly that one reference file (verified present, no nested references inside it), so disclosure is one level deep and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |