Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a high-quality, concrete planning skill: fully executable templates, a clear sequenced workflow, and a built-in self-review validation loop. Its only weak spot is progressive disclosure — everything lives in one ~170-line file with no external references — though it is well sectioned.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive throughout — it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and every section earns its tokens — though a few narrative passages (e.g. 'You reason best about code you can hold in context at once...') could be trimmed, fitting 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready templates (plan header, task structure with real file paths, exact pytest/git commands, inline test and implementation code) covering the common cases, matching 'fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is clearly sequenced (Scope Check → File Structure → Task Right-Sizing → Task Structure → No Placeholders → Self-Review → Execution Handoff) with an explicit Self-Review validation checklist and a spec-coverage/placeholder/type-consistency feedback loop, matching 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; checklists'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, yet the single SKILL.md is well-organized into focused sections with clear headers and the plan/task templates are integral rather than referenceable; this is good structure with minor organization gaps rather than the ideal one-level-deep reference split, fitting 'good structure; most content appropriately placed'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |