Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable and well-structured with clear workflows and genuine progressive disclosure to real reference files. The main weakness is duplicated safety/troubleshooting content that could be consolidated to tighten token use.
Suggestions
Consolidate the overlapping safety material from "Safety Boundaries", "Troubleshooting", and the "Security & Change-Control Addendum" into a single section to reduce redundancy.
Trim the audit checklist's browser paths since the same navigation is already detailed in the Browser Mode workflows.
Consider moving the full troubleshooting matrix into a reference file, keeping only the top failure modes inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with code blocks and tables, but safety guidance is repeated across "Safety Boundaries", "Troubleshooting", and the "Security & Change-Control Addendum", and the audit checklist restates browser workflow paths already covered. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides executable GAQL queries, copy-paste Python snippets for queries and mutations, concrete browser navigation URLs, and specific filter instructions — all directly usable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequenced mode selection, numbered browser/API workflows, and explicit validation/confirmation checkpoints for mutating operations ("requires explicit confirmation listing impacted entities first"). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is an overview with two clearly signaled one-level-deep references (browser-workflows.md, api-setup.md) that exist in the references folder; detail is appropriately split out. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |