The body is mostly efficient with concrete bash commands, but the narrative 'Examples' section and the 'Output' section restate the 'Report Format' block, adding redundant tokens that could be tightened; not a 3 because not every token earns its place.

Provides executable find/grep/diff commands, a concrete report-format template, and action items with explicit file paths and line numbers, matching the 'fully executable, copy-paste ready' anchor.

Eight clearly sequenced steps include an explicit validation checkpoint ('confirm at least 3 data points per source... check the Error Handling table before continuing') with an error-recovery table, satisfying the feedback-loop anchor.

Three references (how-it-works.md, best-practices.md, example-use-cases.md) are well-signaled and one level deep, but errors.md duplicates the body's Error Handling table and examples.md is unreferenced, so content is not cleanly split; not a 3 due to this duplication and orphaned file.

Names multiple concrete actions ('Validate messaging consistency across website, GitHub repos, and local documentation generating read-only discrepancy reports') across named sources in third person, matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

Explicitly answers both what ('Validate messaging consistency...generating read-only discrepancy reports') and when ('Use when checking content alignment or finding mixed messaging'), with explicit trigger guidance.

Provides natural trigger phrases users would actually say ('check consistency', 'validate documentation', or 'audit messaging'), giving good coverage of common variations.

The cross-source messaging-consistency niche with explicit triggers is clearly distinguishable and unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; not the level below because the scope is specific rather than merely 'somewhat specific'.