CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

analyzing-liquidity-pools

Analyze DEX liquidity pools for TVL, volume, fees, impermanent loss, and LP profitability. Use when analyzing liquidity pools, calculating impermanent loss, or comparing DEX pools. Trigger with phrases like "analyze liquidity pool", "calculate impermanent loss", "LP returns", "pool TVL", "DEX pool metrics", or "compare pools".

72

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable CLI skill body with executable commands and a useful error table, but it carries mild redundancy in the Examples section and does not fully wire up its own reference bundle (errors.md and examples.md are unlinked while parallel content stays inline).

Suggestions

Link references/examples.md and references/errors.md from the body, or move the inline Examples and Error Handling tables into those files and point to them, so the whole bundle is navigable and inline content is not duplicated.

Trim the Examples section to only novel variations (e.g. --chain ethereum, --token ETH); remove re-demonstrations of commands already shown in Instructions.

Add an explicit validation checkpoint for compare/export workflows (e.g. confirm the output file was written, or verify the pool address resolved before exporting) to strengthen workflow clarity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes competence (no explaining what TVL/IL is), but the Examples section largely re-demonstrates commands already shown in Instructions (--compare --fee-tiers, --il-calc), which is mild redundancy that could be tightened.

2.5 / 3

Actionability

Every instruction is a fully executable bash command with real flags, a concrete pool address (0x88e6a0c2...), and inline parameter explanations — copy-paste ready, matching the top anchor.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Five capabilities are clearly enumerated and an Error Handling table gives cause/fix recovery, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints for a chained process; it sits between the listed-steps anchor and the validate-then-proceed anchor.

2.5 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

implementation.md is well-signaled one level deep, but references/errors.md and references/examples.md exist as bundle files yet are never linked from the body, while the body keeps inline Error Handling and Examples sections that mirror them — content that should be separate is inline.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-structured description: concrete capabilities, an explicit Use-when clause, natural trigger phrases, and a distinctive DeFi niche. It hits the top anchor on every dimension with no padding or over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete capabilities — "TVL, volume, fees, impermanent loss, and LP profitability" — matching the anchor for several specific concrete actions rather than a vague domain mention.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("Analyze DEX liquidity pools for...") and when ("Use when analyzing liquidity pools...") plus a dedicated trigger-phrase clause, satisfying the top anchor for both what AND when.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases a user would actually say ("analyze liquidity pool", "calculate impermanent loss", "LP returns", "pool TVL", "DEX pool metrics", "compare pools") give good coverage, matching the top anchor.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The DEX/liquidity-pool/IL niche with domain-specific triggers is unlikely to overlap with other skills, matching the clear-niche anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.