tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill analyzing-network-latencyAnalyze network latency and optimize request patterns for faster communication. Use when diagnosing slow network performance or optimizing API calls. Trigger with phrases like "analyze network latency", "optimize API calls", or "reduce network delays".
Validation
81%| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 13 / 16 Passed | |
Implementation
20%This skill is highly verbose and abstract, explaining concepts Claude already understands while failing to provide any concrete, executable guidance. It describes what the skill 'will do' rather than providing actual commands, code snippets, or specific tools for network latency analysis. The content would benefit from dramatic reduction and replacement of descriptions with actionable examples.
Suggestions
Replace abstract descriptions with concrete commands (e.g., `curl -w '@curl-format.txt' -o /dev/null -s https://example.com` for latency measurement)
Remove sections explaining what Claude 'will do' and instead provide executable code examples for connection pooling, request batching, etc.
Add specific tool usage examples with actual output formats (e.g., how to interpret traceroute output, specific curl timing metrics)
Consolidate the redundant 'Overview', 'How It Works', and 'When to Use' sections into a single brief introduction
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose with extensive padding explaining concepts Claude already knows. Sections like 'Overview', 'How It Works', and 'When to Use This Skill' repeat the same information multiple times and explain obvious concepts like what parallelization and connection pooling are. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | No concrete code, commands, or executable examples provided. The entire skill describes what Claude 'will do' abstractly rather than providing specific tools, commands, or code snippets for actually measuring latency or implementing optimizations. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Instructions' section provides a numbered sequence of steps, but lacks validation checkpoints, specific commands for each step, and no feedback loops for error recovery. The steps are too abstract to be actionable. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into sections but is monolithic with no references to external files. The 'Resources' section mentions guides but provides no actual links. Content that could be split (examples, error handling) is all inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Activation
90%This is a well-structured description with explicit trigger guidance and clear 'when to use' clauses. The main weakness is that the capability description could be more specific about concrete actions and techniques. The trigger terms are natural and the scope is distinct enough to avoid conflicts with other skills.
Suggestions
Expand specificity by listing concrete actions like 'measure round-trip times, identify bottlenecks, batch API requests, implement request caching, analyze connection pooling'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (network latency, request patterns) and some actions (analyze, optimize), but lacks comprehensive concrete actions like specific techniques or outputs (e.g., 'measure round-trip times', 'batch requests', 'implement caching'). | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (analyze network latency, optimize request patterns) and when (diagnosing slow network performance, optimizing API calls) with explicit trigger phrases provided. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes good natural trigger terms users would say: 'analyze network latency', 'optimize API calls', 'reduce network delays', 'slow network performance'. These cover common variations of how users would phrase such requests. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused on network latency and API request optimization with distinct triggers. Unlikely to conflict with general performance or code optimization skills due to specific network/API focus. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Reviewed
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.