CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

clay-architecture-variants

Choose and implement Clay integration architecture for different scales and use cases. Use when designing new Clay integrations, comparing direct vs queue-based vs event-driven, or planning architecture for Clay-powered data operations. Trigger with phrases like "clay architecture", "clay blueprint", "how to structure clay", "clay integration design", "clay event-driven".

67

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, actionable architecture reference with concrete code and useful decision/error tables, but it leans token-heavy (large duplicative diagrams), lacks an explicit validated implementation workflow, and relies on a broken external reference rather than real progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Trim or remove the ASCII architecture diagrams — the TypeScript code and prose already convey the data flow, and the diagrams cost significant tokens for largely duplicative information.

Add an explicit implementation workflow with validation checkpoints (e.g., verify webhook delivery, confirm CRM sync, test rate-limit behavior) rather than presenting the architectures only as a catalog of options.

Fix the dangling `clay-known-pitfalls` reference: the file does not exist in the bundle, so either create it as a real reference file and link it properly, or remove the pointer.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with concrete code and tables, but the three large ASCII architecture diagrams (~40 lines) duplicate information already conveyed by the TypeScript and prose and could be tightened for token budget.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides real, executable TypeScript using concrete libraries (bullmq, fetch) plus a specific decision matrix and an error-handling table with concrete solutions — copy-paste-ready in structure with obvious helper abstractions.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Content is organized as a catalog of options with a decision matrix and error table, giving an implicit choose-then-implement sequence, but there is no explicit sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints or validate-fix-retry feedback loops for these batch/integration operations.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Well-sectioned single file, but all ~200 lines are inline with no real reference files; the only pointer ("see `clay-known-pitfalls`") is a bare code-span to a file that does not exist in the bundle, so content that could be split stays inline.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that states concrete capabilities, gives explicit "Use when" triggers and natural keyword phrases, occupies a distinct niche, and uses third-person/imperative voice consistent with the good examples. Voice follows the good-example pattern ("Choose and implement...") so no specificity penalty applies.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions across the architecture lifecycle — "Choose and implement", "designing", "comparing direct vs queue-based vs event-driven", "planning architecture" — naming the specific variants rather than vague verbs.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ("Choose and implement Clay integration architecture for different scales and use cases") and when (an explicit "Use when..." clause plus trigger phrases), matching the anchor for both what AND when.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Provides explicit natural trigger phrases a user would say ("clay architecture", "clay blueprint", "how to structure clay", "clay integration design", "clay event-driven") with good coverage of variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (Clay integration architecture patterns) with distinct, Clay-specific triggers unlikely to collide with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.