clay-ci-integration
Configure CI/CD pipelines for Clay integrations with automated testing and validation. Use when setting up automated tests for Clay webhook handlers, validating enrichment data quality in CI, or integrating Clay checks into your build process. Trigger with phrases like "clay CI", "clay GitHub Actions", "clay automated tests", "CI clay", "test clay integration".
85
83%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured skill description with explicit 'Use when' and 'Trigger with' clauses that clearly define both purpose and activation conditions. The trigger terms are natural and specific to the Clay+CI/CD niche, making it highly distinctive. The main weakness is that the capability description could be more concrete about specific actions performed (e.g., generating config files, writing test suites).
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions to the first sentence, e.g., 'Generate GitHub Actions workflows, write test suites for webhook handlers, create validation scripts for enrichment data quality checks.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | It names the domain (CI/CD pipelines for Clay integrations) and mentions some actions (automated testing, validation, setting up automated tests, validating enrichment data quality), but doesn't list multiple concrete specific actions like 'create pipeline configs, write test fixtures, set up webhook mocks'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (configure CI/CD pipelines for Clay integrations with automated testing and validation) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with specific scenarios plus a 'Trigger with phrases' section listing exact trigger terms). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural trigger terms: 'clay CI', 'clay GitHub Actions', 'clay automated tests', 'CI clay', 'test clay integration', plus contextual terms like 'webhook handlers', 'enrichment data quality', and 'build process'. Good coverage of terms users would naturally say. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche combining CI/CD with Clay integrations specifically. The combination of 'Clay' + 'CI/CD' creates a distinct trigger space unlikely to conflict with generic CI/CD skills or generic Clay skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid, highly actionable skill with complete, executable code examples covering GitHub Actions workflows, unit tests, schema validation, and safety guards. Its main weakness is length—the inline test files and validation scripts make it verbose for a single SKILL.md, and some content could be extracted into bundle files. The workflow is well-sequenced with good validation checkpoints including credit budget protection.
Suggestions
Extract the test file (clay-handler.test.ts) and schema validation script (validate-clay-schemas.ts) into bundle files and reference them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure and reduce inline bulk.
Remove the Overview paragraph's enumerated list of what CI focuses on—the steps themselves make this clear, and Claude doesn't need the preamble.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some unnecessary verbosity—the overview section explains what CI focuses on (which Claude can infer), and some test examples are more extensive than needed. The credit budget guard and error handling table add genuine value, but the schema validation script's placeholder comments ('Run against test fixtures, mock data, etc.') are filler. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides fully executable GitHub Actions YAML, complete TypeScript test files with vitest, Zod schema validation scripts, and concrete bash commands for secret configuration. Code is copy-paste ready with realistic examples and specific values. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clearly sequenced across 5 steps with logical progression from CI setup → secrets → unit tests → schema validation → budget guards. Validation checkpoints are explicit (PII checks, schema validation, credit budget guards, webhook connectivity checks with HTTP code verification), and the error handling table provides a feedback loop for common failure modes. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear sections, but it's quite long and monolithic for a single SKILL.md with no bundle files. The test examples and schema validation scripts could be split into referenced files. The 'Next Steps' reference to 'clay-deploy-integration' is appropriate, but the lack of any supporting bundle files means all content is inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
3a2d27d
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.