clay-ci-integration
Configure CI/CD pipelines for Clay integrations with automated testing and validation. Use when setting up automated tests for Clay webhook handlers, validating enrichment data quality in CI, or integrating Clay checks into your build process. Trigger with phrases like "clay CI", "clay GitHub Actions", "clay automated tests", "CI clay", "test clay integration".
85
83%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured description that clearly defines its niche at the intersection of Clay integrations and CI/CD pipelines. It excels in completeness with explicit 'Use when' and 'Trigger with' clauses, and has strong distinctiveness. The main weakness is that the specific capabilities could be more concrete—listing particular actions like creating GitHub Actions workflows, writing test fixtures, or configuring validation rules would strengthen it.
Suggestions
Add more concrete specific actions such as 'create GitHub Actions workflow files, write webhook handler test fixtures, configure data quality validation rules' to improve specificity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | It names the domain (CI/CD pipelines for Clay integrations) and mentions some actions (automated testing, validation, setting up automated tests, validating enrichment data quality), but doesn't list multiple concrete specific actions like 'create pipeline configs, write test fixtures, set up webhook mocks'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (configure CI/CD pipelines for Clay integrations with automated testing and validation) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with specific scenarios plus a 'Trigger with phrases' section). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes a good set of natural trigger terms: 'clay CI', 'clay GitHub Actions', 'clay automated tests', 'CI clay', 'test clay integration', plus contextual phrases like 'webhook handlers', 'enrichment data quality', and 'build process'. These cover realistic user phrasings well. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The combination of 'Clay' (a specific platform) with 'CI/CD' creates a very distinct niche. It's unlikely to conflict with generic CI/CD skills or generic Clay skills due to the intersection of both domains. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid, actionable skill with executable code examples covering the full CI/CD pipeline for Clay integrations. Its main strength is the comprehensive, copy-paste-ready workflow with proper validation guards (credit budget, PII checks, webhook connectivity). The primary weakness is that it's somewhat long for a SKILL.md file—the detailed test examples and schema validation could be split into referenced files to improve token efficiency.
Suggestions
Move the detailed test examples (Step 3) and schema validation code (Step 4) into separate referenced files to reduce the main skill's token footprint.
Remove the placeholder comments in validate-clay-schemas.ts ('Run against test fixtures, mock data, etc.') and either provide the actual validation loop or omit the script body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly well-structured but includes some unnecessary verbosity. The schema validation script (Step 4) has placeholder comments rather than real validation logic, and some sections like the overview explain things Claude would already understand. The test examples are thorough but could be more concise. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides fully executable GitHub Actions YAML, complete TypeScript test files with vitest, concrete bash commands for secret configuration, and specific schema validation code with zod. All code is copy-paste ready and includes realistic examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: unit tests run before integration tests (via `needs`), data validation checks for PII in fixtures, credit budget guards prevent accidental waste, and the webhook connectivity check validates before proceeding. The error handling table provides clear feedback loops for common failure modes. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear sections and steps, but it's quite long (~180 lines of substantive content) and could benefit from splitting detailed test examples and schema validation into separate reference files. The reference to `clay-deploy-integration` in Next Steps is good but the main body could be leaner with external references. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
c8a915c
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.