CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

clay-cost-tuning

Optimize Clay credit spending with provider key management, waterfall tuning, and budget controls. Use when analyzing Clay costs, reducing credit consumption, or implementing spending alerts and caps. Trigger with phrases like "clay cost", "clay billing", "reduce clay costs", "clay pricing", "clay expensive", "clay budget", "clay credits".

71

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-sequenced skill body with executable code, concrete setup guidance, and validation checkpoints for batch credit operations. Its main weaknesses are inline time-sensitive pricing details that hurt conciseness, and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure to reference files.

Suggestions

Move time-sensitive pricing details (the March 2026 Data Credits/Actions split and the failed-lookup change) into a dedicated "Pricing changes" or "Deprecated patterns" section so they do not penalize conciseness and age more gracefully.

Split the full code modules (cost-filter, sampler, budget-monitor, cost-per-lead calculator) into files under references/ and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with one-level-deep links, improving progressive disclosure.

Tighten the inline code commentary where it restates what the code already shows (e.g., the sample workflow comments) to reduce token load.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient, domain-specific, and free of generic concept explanations, but it embeds time-sensitive information ("Clay's March 2026 pricing split", "March 2026 change") inline rather than in a deprecated/old-patterns section, which the guidelines say should penalize conciseness. It is not level 3 because not every token earns its place, and not level 1 because it avoids padding with concepts Claude already knows.

2 / 3

Actionability

It provides fully executable TypeScript (cost-filter, sampler, budget-monitor, cost calculator), concrete setup steps ("Go to Settings > Connections in Clay, click Add Connection, and paste your provider API key"), and specific credit-cost tables — copy-paste ready. It is not level 2, which would rely on pseudocode or miss key details.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1–6 are clearly sequenced, with explicit validation checkpoints for the batch credit-spend operation (Step 4 sample→hit-rate gate: "If hit rate > 60%, proceed... If hit rate < 40%, clean input data first"; Step 5 budget STOP caps) plus an Error Handling table for recovery. It is not level 2 because validation checkpoints and error-recovery guidance are present rather than missing.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized (Overview, Prerequisites, Steps 1–6, Error Handling, Resources, Next Steps), but the ~200-line SKILL.md is monolithic: all full code implementations are inline and no bundle reference files exist under references/scripts/assets. The under-50-line exception does not apply, so content that could be split (the four code modules) is inline, matching the score-2 anchor. It is not level 1 because organization is clear with no deeply nested references.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it states concrete capabilities, includes an explicit "Use when" trigger clause, and supplies a rich set of natural trigger phrases scoped to a distinct Clay-cost niche. No first/second-person voice is used, so no specificity penalty applies.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It lists multiple concrete actions — "provider key management, waterfall tuning, and budget controls" — comparable to the score-3 anchor "Extract text and tables from PDF files, fill forms, merge documents." It is not the level below, which only names a domain and partial actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

It clearly answers both what ("Optimize Clay credit spending with provider key management, waterfall tuning, and budget controls") and when (explicit "Use when analyzing Clay costs, reducing credit consumption, or implementing spending alerts and caps"). It is not level 2, where the when clause is missing or only implied.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It provides broad coverage of natural phrases a user would say — "clay cost", "clay billing", "reduce clay costs", "clay pricing", "clay expensive", "clay budget", "clay credits" — matching the score-3 anchor's good coverage of natural terms.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clay is a specific SaaS product and every trigger term contains "clay", giving it a clear niche with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. It is not level 2, which would still risk overlapping with similar skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.