clay-deploy-integration
Deploy Clay-powered applications to Vercel, Cloud Run, or Docker with proper secrets management. Use when deploying Clay webhook receivers, enrichment pipelines, or CRM sync services to production infrastructure. Trigger with phrases like "deploy clay", "clay Vercel", "clay production deploy", "clay Cloud Run", "clay Docker", "host clay integration".
84
82%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its scope (deploying Clay-powered applications), specifies concrete deployment targets and application types, and provides explicit trigger guidance with natural user phrases. It follows third-person voice and is concise without unnecessary padding.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: deploying to Vercel, Cloud Run, or Docker, with proper secrets management. Also specifies the types of applications: webhook receivers, enrichment pipelines, CRM sync services. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (deploy Clay-powered applications to Vercel/Cloud Run/Docker with secrets management) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with specific scenarios plus a 'Trigger with phrases' section). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms including 'deploy clay', 'clay Vercel', 'clay production deploy', 'clay Cloud Run', 'clay Docker', 'host clay integration'. These are phrases users would naturally say when needing this skill. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with the 'Clay' domain qualifier combined with specific deployment targets (Vercel, Cloud Run, Docker). The combination of Clay + deployment creates a clear niche unlikely to conflict with generic deployment or generic Clay skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid, actionable deployment skill with complete, executable code examples across three platforms and good error handling guidance. Its main weaknesses are the monolithic structure (all three deployment paths inline rather than split into referenced files) and the lack of explicit validation checkpoints between deployment steps. The content is mostly efficient but could be tightened by removing some explanatory text and splitting platform-specific details.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints after each deployment step (e.g., 'Verify: curl https://your-url/health should return 200' before proceeding to configure Clay)
Split the three deployment platform sections into separate referenced files (e.g., clay-deploy-vercel.md, clay-deploy-cloudrun.md, clay-deploy-docker.md) to reduce SKILL.md length and improve progressive disclosure
Add a feedback loop for deployment failures — if the endpoint isn't reachable after deploy, what specific steps to diagnose and fix
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some unnecessary content — the health check endpoint that POSTs to Clay's webhook URL as a 'health check' is questionable, and the inline code examples are lengthy. Some sections like the overview explaining 'Clay itself is a hosted SaaS' are mildly redundant for Claude. The error handling table and env var listing add value but could be tighter. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides fully executable, copy-paste ready code across all three deployment platforms — complete Vercel serverless function with signature validation, Dockerfile, docker-compose.yml, Cloud Run CLI commands, and environment variable setup. Commands are specific with real flags and options. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced and labeled with platform recommendations, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints between steps. After deploying, there's no 'verify deployment succeeded' step before configuring Clay. Step 4 mentions 'test on a single row' which is good but brief. Missing a feedback loop for deployment failures — if the deploy fails or the endpoint isn't reachable, there's no explicit retry/fix guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear headers and a logical flow, but it's quite long for a single SKILL.md with no bundle files. The three deployment options (Vercel, Cloud Run, Docker) could each be separate referenced files. The single reference to 'clay-webhooks-events' at the end is appropriate but the main body could benefit from splitting platform-specific details into separate files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
3a2d27d
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.