CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

clerk-prod-checklist

Production readiness checklist for Clerk deployment. Use when preparing to deploy, reviewing production configuration, or auditing Clerk implementation before launch. Trigger with phrases like "clerk production", "clerk deploy checklist", "clerk go-live", "clerk launch ready".

81

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/saas-packs/clerk-pack/skills/clerk-prod-checklist/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

79%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description excels at trigger terms, completeness, and distinctiveness by clearly specifying when to use the skill and targeting a narrow niche (Clerk production deployment). However, it is weak on specificity—it names no concrete actions or checklist items, leaving the user and Claude unclear on what the skill actually does beyond being a generic 'checklist'.

Suggestions

Add specific concrete actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Verifies API key configuration, checks webhook endpoints, audits session and token settings, reviews domain and redirect URI setup for Clerk production deployment.'

Replace the vague 'production readiness checklist' with enumerated capabilities so Claude can better match user requests to this skill's actual content.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description says 'production readiness checklist for Clerk deployment' but does not list any concrete actions like 'verify API keys', 'check webhook configurations', or 'audit session settings'. It names the domain (Clerk deployment) but describes no specific capabilities.

1 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (production readiness checklist for Clerk deployment) and 'when' (preparing to deploy, reviewing production configuration, auditing before launch) with explicit trigger phrases.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger phrases users would say: 'clerk production', 'clerk deploy checklist', 'clerk go-live', 'clerk launch ready', plus terms like 'deploy', 'production configuration', and 'launch'. Good coverage of natural variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly specific to Clerk production deployment readiness, which is a clear niche. The combination of 'Clerk' + 'production/deploy/go-live' makes it very unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Implementation

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a strong, highly actionable production checklist with executable validation scripts, CI integration examples, and well-organized checklists covering multiple deployment concerns. Its main weakness is length — the content is comprehensive but could benefit from splitting detailed checklists into separate reference files to improve progressive disclosure. The workflow is clear with explicit validation checkpoints and error recovery guidance.

Suggestions

Consider moving the detailed security, monitoring, error handling, and performance checklists into separate reference files (e.g., SECURITY_CHECKLIST.md, MONITORING.md) and linking to them from the main skill to reduce inline bulk.

Remove checklist items that are general best practices Claude already knows (e.g., '.env.local in .gitignore', 'no secret keys in client code') to improve conciseness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is mostly efficient with well-structured checklists and executable code, but some checklist items are somewhat obvious for Claude (e.g., '.env.local in .gitignore', 'no secret keys in client code'). The tables add some bulk but serve as useful reference. Overall reasonably lean but could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides a fully executable validation script in TypeScript, a concrete CI/CD YAML integration example, a copy-paste-ready error boundary component, and specific environment variable names and key prefixes. Every checklist item has a concrete action column.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps are clearly sequenced from environment configuration through validation, security, monitoring, error handling, and performance. The validation script in Step 2 serves as an explicit checkpoint with pass/fail output and a non-zero exit code for CI gating. The CI example closes the feedback loop by blocking deployment on failures.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is well-structured with clear sections and headers, but it's quite long and monolithic. The security, monitoring, error handling, and performance checklists could be split into separate reference files. The 'Resources' section provides external links and 'Next Steps' points to another skill, but inline content is heavy.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation9 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

9

/

11

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.