cloud-function-generator
Cloud Function Generator - Auto-activating skill for GCP Skills. Triggers on: cloud function generator, cloud function generator Part of the GCP Skills skill category.
36
Quality
3%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
100%
1.01xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./planned-skills/generated/14-gcp-skills/cloud-function-generator/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
7%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is severely underdeveloped, essentially just restating the skill name without explaining capabilities or providing useful trigger guidance. It lacks concrete actions, natural user keywords, and explicit 'when to use' instructions. The redundant trigger terms and boilerplate structure suggest this is a template that wasn't properly filled out.
Suggestions
Add specific actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Generates, deploys, and configures Google Cloud Functions including HTTP triggers, Pub/Sub triggers, and Cloud Storage triggers.'
Include a 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms: 'Use when the user mentions serverless, GCP functions, Cloud Functions, event-driven functions, or deploying Python/Node.js functions to Google Cloud.'
Remove the redundant trigger term and add variations users would naturally say: 'gcf', 'google cloud function', 'serverless GCP', 'deploy to cloud functions'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description only states 'Cloud Function Generator' without describing any concrete actions. It doesn't explain what the skill actually does - no verbs describing capabilities like 'creates', 'deploys', 'configures', etc. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The description fails to answer 'what does this do' beyond the name itself, and the 'when' clause is just a repetition of the skill name rather than meaningful trigger guidance. No explicit 'Use when...' clause with actionable triggers. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | The trigger terms are redundant ('cloud function generator' listed twice) and overly specific. Missing natural variations users would say like 'serverless function', 'GCP function', 'deploy function', 'lambda equivalent', or 'Cloud Functions'. | 1 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The GCP/Cloud Function focus provides some distinctiveness from generic coding skills, but 'cloud function' could overlap with AWS Lambda or Azure Functions skills. The lack of specific GCP terminology weakens differentiation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 5 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
0%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill content is essentially a placeholder template with no actionable information. It describes what a cloud function generator skill should do without providing any actual guidance, code examples, or concrete instructions for generating GCP Cloud Functions. The entire content is meta-description that wastes tokens without teaching Claude anything useful.
Suggestions
Add executable code examples showing how to create GCP Cloud Functions (e.g., Python/Node.js function templates, gcloud CLI commands, or Terraform configurations)
Include a concrete workflow with steps: define function → write handler code → configure triggers → deploy → validate deployment
Remove all meta-description sections ('Purpose', 'When to Use', 'Capabilities', 'Example Triggers') and replace with actual implementation guidance
Add specific examples for common Cloud Function patterns (HTTP triggers, Pub/Sub triggers, Cloud Storage triggers) with copy-paste ready code
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is padded with generic boilerplate that provides no actual value. Phrases like 'Provides step-by-step guidance' and 'Follows industry best practices' are vague filler that Claude doesn't need to be told. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | There is zero concrete guidance, no code examples, no commands, and no actual instructions on how to generate cloud functions. The entire content describes what the skill does rather than instructing how to do it. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No workflow is defined whatsoever. Despite claiming to provide 'step-by-step guidance,' there are no actual steps, sequences, or validation checkpoints present. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is a monolithic block of meta-description with no structure pointing to actual implementation details, examples, or reference materials. No useful navigation or content organization exists. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 4 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
0c08951
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.