tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill coderabbit-hello-worldCreate a minimal working CodeRabbit example. Use when starting a new CodeRabbit integration, testing your setup, or learning basic CodeRabbit API patterns. Trigger with phrases like "coderabbit hello world", "coderabbit example", "coderabbit quick start", "simple coderabbit code".
Review Score
66%
Validation Score
11/16
Implementation Score
42%
Activation Score
90%
Generated
Validation
Total
11/16Score
Passed| Criteria | Score |
|---|---|
description_voice | 'description' should use third person voice; found second person: 'your ' |
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata |
body_steps | No step-by-step structure detected (no ordered list); consider adding a simple workflow |
Implementation
Suggestions 3
Score
42%Overall Assessment
This skill has good structure and organization but fails at its core purpose: providing a working 'hello world' example. The code snippets are incomplete placeholders rather than executable examples, which defeats the purpose of a quick-start guide. The error handling table is helpful but the actual API call that would demonstrate CodeRabbit functionality is missing.
Suggestions
| Dimension | Score | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | 2/3 | The content has some redundancy - the TypeScript example in the Examples section duplicates Step 2 and 3 code verbatim. The Prerequisites section explains things Claude would infer. However, it's not excessively verbose. |
Actionability | 1/3 | The code examples are incomplete placeholders with '// Your first API call here' comments instead of actual executable API calls. A 'hello world' skill should show a complete, working example that produces the promised output, not pseudocode stubs. |
Workflow Clarity | 2/3 | Steps are listed sequentially but lack validation checkpoints. There's no verification step to confirm the setup works before proceeding, and the error handling table is reactive rather than integrated into the workflow as checkpoints. |
Progressive Disclosure | 3/3 | Good structure with clear sections, appropriate use of external resource links, and a clear pointer to the next skill. Content is well-organized without unnecessary nesting or monolithic blocks. |
Activation
Suggestions 1
Score
90%Overall Assessment
This is a well-structured description with excellent trigger term coverage and clear 'what/when' guidance. The main weakness is the lack of specific concrete actions beyond 'create a minimal working example' - it would benefit from listing 2-3 specific capabilities like API authentication, webhook setup, or review parsing.
Suggestions
| Dimension | Score | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | 2/3 | Names the domain (CodeRabbit) and one action ('Create a minimal working example'), but lacks comprehensive concrete actions like 'configure webhooks', 'set up authentication', or 'parse review comments'. |
Completeness | 3/3 | Clearly answers both what ('Create a minimal working CodeRabbit example') and when ('Use when starting a new CodeRabbit integration, testing your setup, or learning basic CodeRabbit API patterns') with explicit trigger guidance. |
Trigger Term Quality | 3/3 | Explicitly lists natural trigger phrases users would say: 'coderabbit hello world', 'coderabbit example', 'coderabbit quick start', 'simple coderabbit code'. Good coverage of variations. |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | 3/3 | Very specific niche targeting CodeRabbit beginners/setup scenarios. The combination of 'CodeRabbit' + 'hello world/example/quick start' creates distinct triggers unlikely to conflict with other skills. |