Implement CodeRabbit reference architecture with production-grade .coderabbit.yaml configuration. Use when designing review configuration for a new project, establishing team standards, or building a comprehensive review setup from scratch. Trigger with phrases like "coderabbit architecture", "coderabbit best practices", "coderabbit project structure", "coderabbit reference config", "coderabbit full setup".
80
77%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/saas-packs/coderabbit-pack/skills/coderabbit-reference-architecture/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured skill description with strong completeness and distinctiveness. It clearly identifies when to use the skill and provides explicit trigger phrases. The main weakness is that the 'what' portion could be more specific about the concrete actions performed beyond 'implement reference architecture with production-grade config'.
Suggestions
Add 2-3 more specific concrete actions to the 'what' portion, e.g., 'configure review rules, set up language-specific analyzers, define path filters, establish review tone and severity levels' to improve specificity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | It names the domain (CodeRabbit configuration) and mentions some actions like 'implement reference architecture' and 'production-grade .coderabbit.yaml configuration', but doesn't list multiple concrete actions (e.g., setting up review rules, configuring language-specific checks, defining path filters). | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (implement CodeRabbit reference architecture with production-grade .coderabbit.yaml configuration) and 'when' (designing review configuration for a new project, establishing team standards, building comprehensive review setup from scratch), with explicit trigger phrases. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes explicit trigger phrases like 'coderabbit architecture', 'coderabbit best practices', 'coderabbit project structure', 'coderabbit reference config', 'coderabbit full setup' which are natural terms a user would say. Also includes contextual triggers like 'review configuration', 'team standards', and '.coderabbit.yaml'. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche targeting CodeRabbit reference architecture and .coderabbit.yaml configuration. The tool-specific naming and explicit trigger phrases make it highly unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid, highly actionable reference architecture skill with complete, copy-paste ready configurations for multiple project types. Its main weaknesses are length (the architecture diagram, onboarding doc, and multiple project templates could be split out) and missing validation checkpoints in the main workflow sequence. The error handling table is a nice touch but the validation guidance should be integrated into the step-by-step flow.
Suggestions
Move project-specific templates (Node.js, React, Python/Django) and the team onboarding document into separate referenced files to reduce the main skill's token footprint.
Add an explicit validation step after Step 1, e.g., 'Validate YAML syntax: python3 -c "import yaml; yaml.safe_load(open('.coderabbit.yaml'))"' before committing, rather than burying it in the error handling table.
Remove or significantly condense the architecture diagram - Claude understands PR review flows and this adds ~20 lines of ASCII art with minimal instructional value.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly comprehensive but includes some unnecessary verbosity - the architecture diagram, while visually appealing, explains a basic PR workflow Claude already understands. The team onboarding document section and some explanatory comments add bulk. However, most content is configuration-focused and earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a complete, copy-paste ready .coderabbit.yaml configuration with all sections filled out, project-specific template snippets for three tech stacks, a CI pipeline YAML, and a concrete validation command for troubleshooting. Everything is executable and specific. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are numbered (Step 1-4) and sequenced logically, and there's a useful error handling table. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints between steps - e.g., no 'validate the YAML before committing' step in the main workflow, and no feedback loop for verifying the config is actually picked up by CodeRabbit after deployment. The validation command only appears in the error handling table. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references external resources and related skills (coderabbit-install-auth, coderabbit-core-workflow-b) at the end, which is good. However, the main body is quite long (~250 lines) with inline project-specific templates that could be split into separate reference files. The architecture diagram and onboarding document inflate the main file. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
c8a915c
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.