cursor-hello-world

Create your first project using Cursor AI features: Tab, Chat, Composer, and Inline Edit. Triggers on "cursor hello world", "first cursor project", "cursor getting started", "try cursor ai", "cursor basics", "cursor tutorial".

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with a clear sequenced walkthrough and verification step, but it carries some redundant example volume and entirely ignores its own reference bundle, leaving progressive disclosure incomplete.

Suggestions

Link the existing reference files from the body (e.g., a 'Troubleshooting: see [errors.md](references/errors.md)' and 'More examples: see [examples.md](references/examples.md)') so the bundle is reachable.

Trim redundant sample prompts in the Tab, Chat, and Inline Edit sections to one representative example each to tighten conciseness.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly lean and actionable, but each of the four exercises carries multiple sample prompts ("Try These Prompts for Tab", Chat prompts, Inline Edit quick tasks) adding illustrative redundancy that could be trimmed, matching anchor 2 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 3.	2 / 3
Actionability	Setup commands, TypeScript snippets, exact shortcuts (Cmd+L, Cmd+K, Cmd+I, Cmd+Y), and copy-paste-ready prompts are fully executable and specific, matching anchor 3.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clear Setup -> Exercise 1-4 sequence is given with a "Run the Result" verification step (npx tsx src/index.ts) and no destructive operations requiring feedback loops, matching anchor 3.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The body is well-sectioned but the three bundle files (references/quick-start-(5-minutes).md, examples.md, errors.md) are never referenced or signaled from the body, leaving troubleshooting and example content unreachable, matching anchor 2 rather than the well-signaled anchor 3.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description answers both what and when with explicit, natural trigger phrases, but its action descriptions are thin and a couple of triggers are generic enough to risk overlap with sibling Cursor skills.

Suggestions

Expand the description with concrete per-feature actions (e.g., 'Tab completes code as you type, Chat answers questions about your code, Inline Edit rewrites selections, Composer generates multi-file features') to lift specificity.

Narrow the generic triggers ("cursor basics", "cursor tutorial") toward onboarding-specific phrasing to reduce conflict risk with other Cursor skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the Cursor domain and four features (Tab, Chat, Composer, Inline Edit) but uses only one action verb ("Create your first project using...") without describing the concrete action each feature performs, matching anchor 2 rather than the multi-action anchor 3.	2 / 3
Completeness	It states what the skill does ("Create your first project using Cursor AI features...") and provides explicit when-guidance via the "Triggers on..." clause, which is equivalent to a 'Use when...' trigger clause, satisfying anchor 3.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Six natural phrases a user would actually say ("cursor hello world", "first cursor project", "cursor getting started", "try cursor ai", "cursor basics", "cursor tutorial") give good coverage, matching anchor 3.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The onboarding niche is fairly distinct, but broad triggers like "cursor basics" and "cursor tutorial" could plausibly match other Cursor skills, matching anchor 2 rather than a clearly non-conflicting anchor 3.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
allowed_tools_field	'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Commit: 3022dd3

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.